scholarly journals Acellular dermal matrix allograft: An effective adjunct to oronasal fistula repair in patients with cleft palate

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 158 ◽  
Author(s):  
MosaadAbd Al Jawwad Khalifah ◽  
SalahAbdelfattah Metwally ◽  
KhaledAbd Elmonaem Abd ElKader ◽  
MarwaAbdElWahhab El-Kassaby
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Simpson ◽  
Osama A. Samargandi ◽  
Alison Wong ◽  
M. Elise Graham ◽  
Michael Bezuhly

Objective: The current review and survey aim to assess the effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in the repair of cleft palate and oronasal fistula and to evaluate the current trends of ADM use in palate surgery. Design: A systematic review of English articles was conducted using MEDLINE (1960 to July 1, 2016), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960 to July 1, 2016), and EMBASE (1991 to July 1, 2016). Additional studies were identified through a review of references cited in initially identified articles. Search terms included “cleft palate,” “palatal,” “oronasal fistula,” “acellular dermal matrix,” and “Alloderm®.” An online survey was disseminated to members of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association to assess current trends in ADM use in palate surgery. Study Selection: All studies evaluating the outcome of primary palate repair or repair of oronasal fistula with the use of aceullar dermal matrix products were included in the review. Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria for review. Studies were generally of low quality, as indicated by methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) scores ranging from 7 to 14. The pooled estimate for fistula formation after primary palatoplasty following ADM use was 7.1%. The pooled estimate for recurrence of fistula after attempted repair using ADM was 11%. Thirty-six cleft surgeons responded to the online survey study. Of these, 45% used ADM in primary cleft palate repair, while 67% used ADM for repair of oronasal fistulae. Conclusion: Use of ADM products is commonplace in palate surgery. Despite this, there is a paucity of high-quality data demonstrating benefit. Further randomized controlled trials examining ADM in palate surgery are required to help develop structured guidelines and improve care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
AdrianSanchez Balado ◽  
MariaTeresa Fernandez Diez ◽  
MauricioFernando Umaña Ordoñez ◽  
ElenaLorda Barraguer

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1381-1385
Author(s):  
Benjamin K. L. Goh ◽  
Hui-Ling Chia

We describe a case of the combined use of acellular dermal matrix and pedicled buccal fat pad (BFP) in a wide U-shaped cleft palate repair. Acellular dermal matrix was used as a “patch” repair for the nasal mucosa defect as opposed to the conventional inlay graft. The advantages include reduced cost and a smaller avascular graft load. Lateral relaxing incisions were made to ensure tension-free closure of oromucosa at midline. Lateral oromucosa defect closure with well-vascularized pedicled BFP ensures enhanced healing, less palatal contracture and shortening, and reduced infection. The palate healed with mucosalization at 2 weeks, and no complications were noted at 6 months follow-up.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e1682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omri Emodi ◽  
Jiriys George Ginini ◽  
John A. van Aalst ◽  
Dekel Shilo ◽  
Raja Naddaf ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Abdali ◽  
Mohammad Ali Hoghooghi ◽  
Shirin Fattahpour ◽  
Fatemeh Derakhshandeh ◽  
Farnoosh Mohtashampour ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAcellular Dermal Matrix graft is usually used to repair fistulas following a cleft palate and has had positive results. But its use for primary palatoplasty has been less studied. Our aim was to compare the usefulness of using Acellular Dermal Matrix transplantation for primary palatoplasty with intravelar veloplasty in contrast to its lack of useMaterials and methodsA total of 72 children (6 months to 6 years old) with cleft palate were included in the study. The case-control prospective observations were conducted. A group underwent primary palatoplasty with intravelar veloplasty using Acellular Dermal Matrix and the control group had the same surgery without using Acellular Dermal Matrix. Patients were monitored for fistula formation, post-operative infection, and ulcers.ResultsNo post-surgical infection and wound opening was seen in any group. In the recipients of Acellular Dermal Matrix and control group three and six fistula was reported in which patients had soft and hard palate involvement and the cleft with length greater than 15 mm.ConclusionsConsidering the double incidence of fistulas in the control group compared to the ADM recipient, it seems that the use of ADM can be effective in reducing the incidence of fistulas. Since fistula is one of the complications of primary palatoplasty surgery and leads to secondary surgeries, the use of ADM can be helpful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document