scholarly journals Validity, reliability and factor analysis of Persian version of schizophrenia quality of life scale

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
GholamReza Kheirabadi ◽  
Nasrin Masaeli ◽  
Victoria Omranifard ◽  
MohammadReza Maracy ◽  
Anahita Khedri
Author(s):  
Sahar Balanian ◽  
Hossein Fallahzadeh ◽  
Mohammad Ali Morowati Sharifabad

Background:Menopause can have adverse effects on the quality of life of postmenopausal women. The main purpose of this study was to determine the Validity and Reliability of the Persian version of the Utian Quality of Life Scale (UQOL) in iranian postmenopausal women in 2019 Methods: The questionnaire was first translated into Persian. After its adaptation with the original version and backward translating it into English, the face and content validity were assessed by a group of experienced experts. To this end, exploratory factor analysis was performed by Principal Factor Analysis method with varimax rotation. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the Persian version of UQOL and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Finally, the mean quality of life score of postmenopausal women in different domains as well as its mean in different domains based on age, education level, menopausal age, and number of children were calculated. Results: Regarding reliability, the alpha coefficient was obtained 0.66 for occupation domain, 0.52 for health domain, 0.50 for emotional domain, and 0.90 for sex domain. There was a significant relationship between quality of life and age, menopausal age, occupation and number of children in all domains in menopausal women. There was a significant relationship between BMI and quality of life score in postmenopausal women only in physical health domain. Conclusion:it seems this questionnaire can’t be used in research on the quality of life of postmenopausal women.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamileh Azizbeigi-Boukani ◽  
Ahmad Reza Khatoonabadi ◽  
Saman Maroufizadeh ◽  
Siamak Abdi

Aphasiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamileh Azizbeigi-Boukani ◽  
Ahmad Reza Khatoonabadi ◽  
Saman Maroufizadeh ◽  
Siamak Abdi

2018 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Behrang Shadloo ◽  
Maryam Masoomi ◽  
Saharnaz Nedjat ◽  
Zahra Bahrami ◽  
Vandad Sharifi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-42
Author(s):  
Justus K. Musya

Slight differences in standard of living, issuing from horizontal inequalities between ethnic groups, are a predicate of ethnopolitical violence in Kenya. Developing and validating a scale to estimate the quality of life differences, between warring ethnic groups, can deepen our understanding of an important precursor of ethnopolitical conflict. From a careful review of poverty and developmental literature, the 16 items used in the Quality of Life Scale emerged. In subsequent exploratory factor analysis, a three-factor solution surfaced, and this was subjected to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CFA model scale met the criteria for composite reliability, construct validity, and strict factorial invariance. The scale has enriched our understanding of the three latent dimensions of quality of life that matter most in characterizing the quality of life. First, the indicator "proud about your life" was the strongest factor for latent factor social and physical wellbeing. Second, “can save income”, a proxy for quality of employment. This was the leading indicator for latent factor disposable income. Third, and the indicator “house comfortable to live in” was the notable indicator of latent factor living standards. The Quality of Life Scale can track trends in quality of life of ethnic groups that have a history of ethnopolitical conflict in places like Mathare and Kibra. The scale can be used in other known hotspots of violence in Kenya too where ethnic groups are susceptible to ethnopolitical conflict borne of quality of life differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document