scholarly journals Endoscopic management of concomitant biliary and duodenal malignant obstruction: Impact of the timing of drainage for one vs. two procedures and the modalities of biliary drainage

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Antoine Debourdeau ◽  
Fabrice Caillo ◽  
Christophe Zemmour ◽  
JéromePolypo Winkler ◽  
Claire Decoster ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Abdirashev ◽  
N Abdiyev ◽  
S Izmagambetova ◽  
A Uzhakhov

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. AB613
Author(s):  
Yusuke Hashimoto ◽  
Hideaki Takahashi ◽  
Izumi Ohno ◽  
Tomoji Katoh ◽  
Yoshihiro Sasaki ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 768-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Everson L.A. Artifon ◽  
Dayse Aparicio ◽  
Jose B. Paione ◽  
Simon K. Lo ◽  
Andre Bordini ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1281
Author(s):  
Suhail Rafiq ◽  
Azhar Khan ◽  
Jan Suhail ◽  
Nasir Choh ◽  
Feroze Shaheen

Background: Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) is performed either via right or left-ductal approach, on the basis of status of primary confluence, secondary confluence and atrophy of liver parenchyma. Our study compares the complications of two approaches in malignant obstruction. The objectives of this study was to assess and compare complications of PTBD.Methods: This study was a prospective hospital based study performed for a period of 2 years from 2016 to 2018.PTBD was performed either via right in 16 patients or left-ductal approach in 15 patients, on the basis of status of primary biliary confluence and atrophy of liver parenchyma.Results: Both minor and major complications were more common in right-sided approach as compared to left-sided approach with most common major and minor complication being cholangitis (16.12%) and fever (12.9%) respectively.Conclusions: PTBD is an excellent palliative procedure to drain the bile ducts in malignant obstruction. Although complications of PTBD are more common in right sided approach but results are statistically insignificant.


2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. AB356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Fernanda Torres-Ruiz ◽  
Jose-Guillermo De La Mora-Levy ◽  
Juan O. Alonso-Larraga ◽  
Julio Sanchez Del Monte ◽  
Angelica Hernandez-Guerrero

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Chi-Chih Wang ◽  
Tzu-Wei Yang ◽  
Wen-Wei Sung ◽  
Ming-Chang Tsai

Biliary and pancreatic cancers occur silently in the initial stage and become unresectable within a short time. When these diseases become symptomatic, biliary obstruction, either with or without infection, occurs frequently due to the anatomy associated with these cancers. The endoscopic management of these patients has changed, both with time and with improvements in medical devices. In this review, we present updated and integrated concepts for the endoscopic management of malignant biliary stricture. Endoscopic biliary drainage had been indicated in malignant biliary obstruction, but the concept of endoscopic management has changed with time. Although routine endoscopic stenting should not be performed in resectable malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) patients, endoscopic biliary drainage is the treatment of choice for palliation in unresectable MDBO patients. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have better stent patency and lower costs compared with plastic stents (PS). For malignant hilum obstruction, PS and uncovered SEMS yield similar short-term outcomes, while a covered stent is not usually used due to a potential unintentional obstruction of contralateral ducts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Suhail Rafiq ◽  
MusaibAhmad Dar ◽  
Naseer Choh ◽  
Feroze Shaheen ◽  
Sadaf Ali ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document