scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of human chorion membrane and platelet-rich fibrin membrane with coronally advanced flap in treatment of Miller's class I and II recession defects: A randomized controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 152 ◽  
Author(s):  
NeerajChandrahas Deshpande ◽  
ShivaniAshwinikumar Dandekar ◽  
DeepakHarishchandra Dave
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Class I ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Coronally Advanced Flap ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Fibrin Membrane

A Comparative Evaluation of the Anaesthetic Properties of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Ketamine Hydrochloride with Dextrose Given Intrathecally for Inguinal Hernia Repair - A Randomized Controlled Study in a Tertiary Centre in South Kerala

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (41) ◽  
pp. 3520-3520
Author(s):  
Ranju Sebastian ◽  
Remani Kelan Kamalakshi ◽  
Jamsheena Muthira Parambath ◽  
Praseetha Vallomparambath Kuttiparambil
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Ketamine Hydrochloride

The above article has been withdrawn on authors’ request. Original CitationSebastian R, Kamalakshi RK, Parambath JM, et al. A comparative evaluation of the anaesthetic properties of upivacaine hydrochloride and ketamine hydrochloride with dextrose given intrathecally for inguinal hernia repair – a randomized controlled study in a tertiary centre in south Kerala. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2021;8(31):2830- 2834. DOI:10.18410/jebmh/2021/518

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap with Platelet-rich Fibrin vs Amniotic Membrane for the Treatment of Gingival Recession

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Gautam
Keyword(s):  
Amniotic Membrane ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Class I ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Coronally Advanced Flap ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
To Receive

ABSTRACT Background The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the outcome of gingival recession technique using the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and amniotic membrane. Materials and methods About 15 patients with bilateral Miller class I buccal gingival recessions (4–5 mm) in maxillary and mandibular canines were selected. The recessions were randomly assigned to receive either the CAF with PRF or the CAF with amniotic membrane. Recession height (RH), recession width (RW), width of keratinized tissue (WKT), thickness of keratinized tissue (TKT), probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured at baseline as well as 6 months postsurgery. Patient satisfaction with esthetics, root sensitivity, and postoperative pain was also evaluated. Results The average percentages of root coverage for CAF with PRF and CAF with amniotic membrane were 92.95% and 97.40% (p < 0.05) respectively, and the complete root coverage observed was 56.94% and 76.47% respectively. The CAF with amniotic membrane showed a statistically significant increase in TKT (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to RH, RW, WKT, PD, and CAL. The esthetic condition after both treatments was considered satisfactory by the patients. Conclusion The outcome of this study reflects that CAF with PRF and amniotic membrane can be successfully used to treat class I gingival recession. How to cite this article Gautam A. Comparative Evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap with Platelet-rich Fibrin vs Amniotic Membrane for the Treatment of Gingival Recession. J Health Sci Res 2017;8(1):31-37.

Comparison of Autogenous Block Bone Graft and Screw Tent-Pole Techniques for Vertical Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Mandible: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 232020682097601
Author(s):  
Gözde Işık ◽  
Tayfun Günbay ◽  
Yig˘it Uyanıkgil ◽  
Hüseyin Kısaog˘lu ◽  
Meltem Özden Yüce
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Block Bone Graft

Aim: To evaluate the effect on vertical bone augmentation of the screw tent-pole technique using particulate allograft in combination with injectable platelet-rich fibrin, and to compare this with autogenous block bone graft. Materials and Methods: This split-mouth randomized controlled study involved patients with bilateral partial edentulism and vertical bone loss in the posterior mandible. In each patient, the control side was treated with autogenous block bone graft harvested from the mandibular ramus and, on the test side, the screw tent-pole technique was employed, using particulate allograft in combination with injectable platelet-rich fibrin. All augmented sites were covered by leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin membrane. The primary outcome variable of this study was the radiographic changes to bone height 6 months after augmentation. The secondary outcome variables were the percentage of newly formed bone and the implant survival rate. The data were analyzed with a significance level of α = 0.05. Results: Of the 13 patients included, a total of 11 patients (7 females, 4 males; mean age 50.92) completed the study. The mean values of vertical bone gain were 1.72 ± 0.78 mm for the test group and 2.83 ± 0.89 mm for the control group, which constitutes a significant difference ( P = .008). The percentage of newly formed bone was 18.08% ± 2.17% for the test group and 14.26% ± 1.76% for the control group. The difference between the groups was statistically significant ( P < .001). The implant survival rates were 100% for both study groups. Conclusions: Based on the study results, screw tent-pole can be considered a feasible technique for bone augmentation. Further randomized studies will be necessary to fully evaluate vertical bone augmentation using the screw tent-pole technique, with different graft materials and with larger samples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document