Comparison of conventional and rapid methods for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
Ashwani Kumar ◽  
Bineeta Kashyap ◽  
Anurag Mehndiratta



Folia Medica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-565
Author(s):  
Raina T. Gergova ◽  
Virna-Maria S. Tsitou ◽  
Ivan G. Mitov

Background: Invasive infections caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRSA/MRSCoN) require fast, adequate treatment.&nbsp; The aim of this study was to develop a faster protocol for direct detection of MRSA/MRSCoN in blood cultures and in abscess punctures based on mecA and species specific identification of S. aureus by polymerase-chain reaction (PCR). Materials and methods: We examined 77 growth-positive BACTEC blood cultures and 50 abscess punctures by routine microbiological assay and simultaneous PCR detection of MRSA/MRSCoN. The speci&#64257;city of the PCR was evaluated by using DNA from another 15 microbial species for negative controls. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxacillin, vancomycin, tigecycline, linezolid, levofloxacin, clindamycin, and erythromycin against the S. aureus isolates using the E-test.&nbsp; Results: In the blood cultures, the two methods detected 39.3% of MRSA, and 93.9% of MRCoNS. In the punctures, the PCR assay identified 20.9% of MRSA and 79.2% of MSSA. In the puncture cases, there were three PCR MRSA positive and culture negative samples. Screening for susceptibility to 14 antimicrobial agents demonstrated significantly higher (p<0.05) methicillin resistance in blood culture isolates than in the puncture ones (39.3% and 20.0%, respectively).&nbsp; Conclusion: The new PCR protocol was very fast and specific. It was more sensitive in detecting MRSA from abscess punctures than the routine microbiological techniques. This protocol will speed up the right choice of empirical therapy, which is extremely important for saving patients&rsquo; lives.



ANKEM Dergisi ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
Yeliz Cetinkol ◽  
Fazilet Ozenc Cakir ◽  
Ozgur Enginyurt


2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Lesens ◽  
Yves Hansmann ◽  
Eimar Brannigan ◽  
Susan Hopkins ◽  
Pierre Meyer ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:To evaluate a new classification for bloodstream infections that differentiates hospital acquired, healthcare associated, and community acquired in patients with blood cultures positive forStaphylococcus aureus.Design:Prospective, observational study.Setting:Three tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospitals in Dublin, Ireland, and Strasbourg, France.Patients:Two hundred thirty consecutive patients older than 18 years with blood cultures positive forS. aureus.Methods:S. aureusbacteremia (SAB) was defined as hospital acquired if the first positive blood culture was performed more than 48 hours after admission. Other SABs were classified as healthcare associated or community acquired according to the definition proposed by Friedman et al. When available, strains of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).Results:Eighty-two patients were considered as having community-acquired bacteremia according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification. Of these 82 patients, 56% (46) had healthcare-associated SAB. MRSA prevalence was similar in patients with hospital-acquired and healthcare-associated SAB (41% vs 33%;P> .05), but significantly lower in the group with community-acquired SAB (11%;P< .03). PFGE of MRSA strains showed that most community-acquired and healthcare-associated MRSA strains were similar to hospital-acquired MRSA strains. On multivariate analysis, Friedman's classification was more effective than the CDC classification for predicting MRSA.Conclusion:These results support the call for a new classification for community-acquired bacteremia that would account for healthcare received outside the hospital by patients with SAB.



2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 2170-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Louie ◽  
S. O. Matsumura ◽  
E. Choi ◽  
M. Louie ◽  
A. E. Simor


2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 3942-3944 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hallin ◽  
N. Maes ◽  
B. Byl ◽  
F. Jacobs ◽  
Y. De Gheldre ◽  
...  


2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 2170-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Louie ◽  
S. O. Matsumura ◽  
E. Choi ◽  
M. Louie ◽  
A. E. Simor


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document