scholarly journals Recent Pharmacological Advances: Focus on Small-cell Lung Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMT.S44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Galustian ◽  
Victoria Sung ◽  
Blake Bartlett ◽  
Lindsey Rolfe ◽  
Angus Dalgleish

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents approximately 15% of all lung cancers, and is the most aggressive form of lung cancer. Left untreated, the time from diagnosis to death is 2–3 months. With current treatment, expected survival is 7–20 months, depending on the stage of disease. A new drug, amrubicin, is approved in Japan for lung cancer and has demonstrated efficacy in U.S. and European phase II trials of SCLC patients with either untreated disease or relapsed refractory illness. In a phase II study of amrubicin in previously untreated patients, response rates reached 75% with a median survival time of almost 1 year. Amrubicin is a fully synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline, and an analog of doxorubicin and epirubicin. The major mechanism of action of amrubicin is inhibition of topoisomerase II. Unlike doxorubicin, however, it exhibits little or no cardiotoxicity in clinical studies and preclinical models. In preclinical rodent tumor models, it is selectively distributed to tumour tissue and is not detected in the heart when compared with doxorubicin, which is distributed equivalently to these sites. The primary metabolite of amrubicin, amrubicinol, is up to 100 times more cytotoxic in vitro than the parent compound. This review describes the mechanisms of action of amrubicin as well as clinical studies which demonstrate the potential of this drug in future SCLC treatment. The review also puts forward hypothetical considerations for the use of other drugs such as lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug acting on multiple signalling pathways, or histone deacetylase inhibitors, in combination with amrubicin in SCLC.

Lung Cancer ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
K. Yanagihara ◽  
Y. Otake ◽  
F. Tanaka ◽  
T. Fukuse ◽  
S. Hitomi ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumithra J. Mandrekar ◽  
Yingwei Qi ◽  
Shauna L. Hillman ◽  
Katie L. Allen Ziegler ◽  
Nicholas F. Reuter ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 604-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Judson ◽  
T. Cerny ◽  
R. Epelbaum ◽  
D. Dunlop ◽  
J. Smyth ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8117-8117 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Gridelli ◽  
M. Mencoboni ◽  
F. Carrozza ◽  
M. G. Viganò ◽  
V. Gebbia ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Bork ◽  
M Hansen ◽  
P Dombernowsky ◽  
S W Hansen ◽  
A G Pedersen ◽  
...  

Teniposide, VM-26 (Vumon), was administered in a dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 every third week to 36 patients with histologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer. None had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The median age was 73 years (range, 52 to 79). Thirty-three patients were evaluable; 21 of these had local disease. Five patients had bone marrow metastases, four had liver involvement, and one CNS metastases. All patients had a performance status less than or equal to 2 before the start of treatment. Thirty patients obtained a response (90%), ten of whom had a complete remission (30%). The median duration of remission was 8+ months (range, 1.1 to 17+ months), whereas the median survival was 8.7 months (range, 1.9 to 20 months). Toxicity was primarily hematologic, with leukopenia the only dose-limiting effect. Besides alopecia, all other side effects were minimal including nausea and vomiting. We find these results provocative in regard to the response rate and the duration of response obtained as well as in reference to the dismal results that prior investigations in previously treated patients have shown. These data may indicate the need for reconsideration of the usual strategy for performing phase II trials.


1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1369-1370
Author(s):  
E L Korn ◽  
R Simon ◽  
M A Friedman ◽  
T D Moore

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document