On Permutation Groups with Regular Subgroup

1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-361
Author(s):  
R. D. Bercov

W. Burnside [3, p. 343] showed that a cyclic group of order pm (p prime, m > l) cannot occur as a regular subgroup of a simply transitive primitive group. (For definitions and notation see [9].) Groups which are contained regularly in a primitive group G only when G is doubly transitive are therefore called B-groups [9, p. 64].

1965 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 480-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald D. Bercov

Certain finite groups H do not occur as a regular subgroup of a uniprimitive (primitive but not doubly transitive) group G. If such a group H occurs as a regular subgroup of a primitive group G, it follows that G is doubly transitive. Such groups H are called B-groups (8) since the first example was given by Burnside (1, p. 343), who showed that a cyclic p-group of order greater than p has this property (and is therefore a B-group in our terminology).Burnside conjectured that all abelian groups are B-groups. A class of counterexamples to this conjecture due to W. A. Manning was given by Dorothy Manning in 1936 (3).


1981 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. W. Johnson

The centralizer ring of a permutation representation of a group appears in several contexts. In (19) and (20) Schur considered the situation where a permutation group G acting on a finite set Ω has a regular subgroup H. In this case Ω may be given the structure of H and the centralizer ring is isomorphic to a subring of the group ring of H. Schur used this in his investigations of B-groups. A group H is a B-group if whenever a permutation group G contains H as a regular subgroup then G is either imprimitive or doubly transitive. Surveys of the results known on B-groups are given in (28), ch. IV and (21), ch. 13. In (28), p. 75, remark F, it is noted that the existence of a regular subgroup is not necessary for many of the arguments. This paper may be regarded as an extension of this remark, but the approach here differs slightly from that suggested by Wielandt in that it appears to be more natural to work with transversals rather than cosets.


2007 ◽  
Vol 310 (2) ◽  
pp. 569-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Baumeister

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 1650068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei Evdokimov ◽  
Ilya Ponomarenko

Let [Formula: see text] be a finite group. There is a natural Galois correspondence between the permutation groups containing [Formula: see text] as a regular subgroup, and the Schur rings (S-rings) over [Formula: see text]. The problem we deal with in the paper, is to characterize those S-rings that are closed under this correspondence, when the group [Formula: see text] is cyclic (the schurity problem for circulant S-rings). It is proved that up to a natural reduction, the characteristic property of such an S-ring is to be a certain algebraic fusion of its coset closure introduced and studied in the paper. Based on this characterization we show that the schurity problem is equivalent to the consistency of a modular linear system associated with a circulant S-ring under consideration. As a byproduct we show that a circulant S-ring is Galois closed if and only if so is its dual.


1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Dixon ◽  
Brian Mortimer

Our object is to describe all of the-primitive permutation groups of degree less than 1000 together with some of their significant properties. We think that such a list is of interest in illustrating in concrete form the kinds of primitive groups which arise, in suggesting conjectures about primitive groups, and in settling small exceptional cases which often occur in proofs of theorems about permutation groups. The range that we consider is large enough to allow examples of most of the types of primitive group to appear. Earlier lists (of varying completeness and accuracy) of primitive groups of degree d have been published by: C. Jordan (1872) [21] ford≤ 17, by W. Burnside (1897) [5] ford≤ 8, by Manning (1929) [34–38] ford≤ 15, by C. C. Sims (1970) [45] ford≤ 20, and by B. A. Pogorelev (1980) [42] ford≤ 50. Unpublished lists have also been prepared by C. C. Sims ford≤ 50 and by Mizutani[41] ford≤ 48. Using the classification of finite simple groups which was completed in 1981 we have been able to extend the list much further. Our task has been greatly simplified by the detailed information about many finite simple groups which is available in theAtlas of Finite Groupswhich we will refer to as theAtlas[8].


1999 ◽  
Vol 197-198 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 247-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Evdokimov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document