Challenges in incentivizing the pharmaceutical industry to supporting pediatric oncology clinical trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Angelini ◽  
Kathryn Pritchard-Jones ◽  
Darren R Hargrave
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne D Hastings ◽  
Natalie K Bradford ◽  
Liane R Lockwood ◽  
Robert S Ware ◽  
Jeanine Young

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S59
Author(s):  
M. Murugappan ◽  
B.L. King-Kallimanis ◽  
G.H. Reaman ◽  
V. Bhatnagar ◽  
E.G. Horodniceanu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Franshaw ◽  
Maria Tsoli ◽  
Jennifer Byrne ◽  
Chelsea Mayoh ◽  
Siva Sivarajasingam ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21534-e21534
Author(s):  
Stacey Crane ◽  
James Croop ◽  
Jill Lunsford Lee ◽  
Jamie Walski ◽  
Joan Haase

e21534 Background: Phase I clinical trials (P1Ts) are an essential step in the validation of novel therapies to treat childhood cancer. Children with cancer participate in P1Ts when no known curative therapy remains for their cancer. It is important to understand the experiences of children with advanced cancer and their families in P1Ts to ensure that participation supports the participants’ well-being. Methods: An empirical phenomenology study, using an adapted Colaizzi method, was conducted of 11 parents’ lived experiences of their child’s participation in pediatric oncology P1Ts. Parents were recruited from two pediatric academic medical centers in the Midwest United States and from national childhood cancer groups not affiliated with either medical center. Parents participated in individual interviews (mean length 59.1 minutes), with one broad data-generating question. Demographics and the child’s clinical trial records provided additional context for understanding the experiences. This presentation describes the study themes identified that were specifically related to pediatric oncology P1T processes and logistics. Results: Parents’ experiences during the P1Ts were primarily positive. However, data analysis revealed five aspects of P1T participation that were problematic for parents to varying degrees. These aspects were: (1) Learning About Clinical Trials, (2) Being Referred to Another Institution, (3) Undergoing Research-Only Procedures, (4) Complying with the Trial Requirements, and (5) Taking Oral Medications. Conclusions: While overall experiences during P1T participation were positive, improvements can be made that could potentially enhance participants’ experiences. In particular, enhancing the education provided to participants during on-trial processes and minimizing the logistical burdens associated with P1T requirements may help to address problematic aspects of P1Ts.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 217-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adelaide Doussau ◽  
Birgit Geoerger ◽  
Irene Jiménez ◽  
Xavier Paoletti

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Panayi ◽  
◽  
Slavka Baronikova ◽  
Jim Purvis ◽  
Eric Southam ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document