scholarly journals Risk Evaluation of Secondary Cancer Induced by Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Treatment

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Duhaini ◽  
Fatima Hijazi ◽  
Eva Sabbah ◽  
Saad Ayoubi ◽  
Sadek Nehmeh ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S77-S78
Author(s):  
M. Verhoeven ◽  
M. Sangen van der ◽  
C. Hurkmans ◽  
L. Boersma ◽  
K. Verhoeven ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela ◽  
Elia del Cerro Peñalver ◽  
Sofía Sanchez García ◽  
Luis Leonardo Guerrero ◽  
David Sanz Rosa ◽  
...  

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and encompasses a broad spectrum of diseases in one with significant epidemiological, clinical, and biological heterogeneity, which determines a different natural history and prognostic profile. Although classical tumour staging (TNM) still provides valuable information, the current reality is that the clinicians must consider other biological and molecular factors that directly influence treatment decision-making. The management of breast cancer has changed radically in the last 15 years due to significant advances in our understanding of these tumours. This knowledge has brought with it a major impact regarding surgical and systemic management and has been practice-changing, but it has also created significant uncertainties regarding how best integrate the radiotherapy treatment into the therapeutic scheme. In parallel, radiotherapy itself has also experienced major advances, new radiobiological concepts have emerged, and genomic data and other patient-specific factors must now be integrated into individualised treatment approaches. In this context, “precision medicine” seeks to provide an answer to these open questions and uncertainties. The aim of the present review is to clarify the meaning of this term and to critically evaluate its role and impact on contemporary breast cancer radiotherapy.


Author(s):  
M Behmadi ◽  
H Gholamhosseinian ◽  
M Mohammadi ◽  
Sh Naseri ◽  
M Momennezad ◽  
...  

Background: Given the importance of scattered and low doses in secondary cancer caused by radiation treatment, the point dose of critical organs, which were not subjected to radiation treatment in breast cancer radiotherapy, was measured.Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the peripheral dose in two techniques of breast cancer radiotherapy with two energies. Methods: Eight different plans in two techniques (conventional and conformal) and two photon energies (6 and 15 MeV) were applied to Rando Alderson Phantom’s DICOM images. Nine organs were contoured in the treatment planning system and specified on the phantom. To measure the photon dose, forty-eight thermoluminescence dosimeters (MTS700) were positioned in special places on the above nine organs and plans were applied to Rando phantom with Elekta presice linac. To obtain approximately the same dose distribution in the clinical organ volume, a wedge was used on planes with an energy of 6 MeV photon.         Results: Point doses in critical organs with 8 different plans demonstrated that scattering in low-energy photon is greater than high-energy photon. In contrast, neutron contamination in high-energy photon is not negligible. Using the wedge and shield impose greater scattering and neutron contamination on patients with low-and high-energy photon, respectively.    Conclusion: Deciding on techniques and energies required for preparing an acceptable treatment plan in terms of scattering and neutron contamination is a key issue that may affect the probability of secondary cancer in a patient.


Author(s):  
Coen Hurkmans ◽  
Cindy Duisters ◽  
Mieke Peters-Verhoeven ◽  
Liesbeth Boersma ◽  
Karolien Verhoeven ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S795-S796
Author(s):  
D. Hernandez ◽  
M.S. Talaya ◽  
C. Anson ◽  
P. Castro ◽  
M. Roch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document