scholarly journals Absorbed Dose to Water Rate in a Cyberknife VSI System Reference Field Using Ionization Chambers and Gafchromic Films

Author(s):  
Guerda Massillon-JL ◽  
Nestor Aragón-Martínez ◽  
Arnulfo Gómez-Muñoz
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-235
Author(s):  
Kumaresh Chandra Paul ◽  
Guenther H Hartmann ◽  
Golam Abu Zakaria

Absorbed dose to water determination in the clinical practice introduces several perturbations factors in ionization chamber dosimetry. Displacement perturbation is one of them, which can be corrected by introducing the chamber-specific quality correction factor (kQ) or by introducing the concept of effective point of measurement (EPOM). The EPOM is the point in the chamber at which the measured dose would be the same as the measuring depth in absence of chamber. The aim of this study was to measure the displacement effect at cylindrical ionization chambers in 6 and 10 MV flat and true photon beams. The percentage of depth doses (PDDs) were considered for determining the shift of EPOM with respect to the well established Roos chamber. The displacement effect obtained a range of 0.25 to 0.57 times r (chamber radius) both in flat and true beams, which disagreed with the TRS-398 protocol recommended constant value of 0.6r.Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 2, 227-235, 2017


Author(s):  
Md. Ali Reza ◽  
Md. Rakibul Islam ◽  
Md. Shakilur Rahman ◽  
Md. Shamsuzzaman ◽  
Md. Rashedur Rahman ◽  
...  

The accuracy and traceability of absorbed dose to water measurement of radiotherapy beam is a critical issue to achieve the curative outcome of cancer patients. The current dosimetry protocols for radiotherapy beams TRS-398, TG-51 and DIN-6800-2 are based on the calibration factor of ionization chamber in terms of absorbed dose to water for 60Co beam. The accuracy of the calibration factor of ionization chamber as well as output of radiotherapy beam is the primary requirements of precisional dose deliver to the tumor which is the QA part of radiotherapy dosimetry. In the present study, we have calibrated 9 different ionization chambers (8 thimbles and 1 parallel plate) of various active volumes for 60Co beam against reference standard NE2571 and compared with manufacturer’s values. The Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) and Output Factors (OF) of two cobalt units were measured with standard calibration system by following IAEA dosimetry protocol TRS-398 and compare with 6 MV photon beam from medical linear accelerator. The traceability of the dosimetry was verified by the participation of postal dose IAEA/WHO intercomparison program. The aim of the participation was to investigate uncertainties involved in the calibration of Ionization Chamber (IC) and absorbed dose measurement. The percentage of deviation relative to IAEA mean dose was found to be -0.2% (traceable limit ±5%), which shows an excellent agreement of calibration of beam as well as ionization chamber with international standard. The deviation of factors of ionization chambers between the measured and manufacturer’s values were found within 0.07-2.81% with an uncertainty of ±1.5% (k=1).


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 025-031
Author(s):  
M Shamsuzzaman ◽  
T Siddiqua ◽  
MMH Bhuiyan ◽  
ASM Habibullah Khan ◽  
MS Rahman

The absorbed dose-to-water calibration coefficients ND,W of some ionization chambers were determined in terms of the secondary standard chambers in 60Co gamma-ray beam based on the TRS-398 protocol. The reference absorbed dose-to-water Dw were measured using secondary standard ionization chambers of model NE 2781#0537 (0.60 cm3 volume) and NE 2771#1205 (0.69 cm3 volume) which are traceable to the dosimetry laboratory of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). This study mainly focuses on the comparative assessment of the determined ND,W coefficients of twenty cylindrical ionization chambers from various user groups. The determined ND,W coefficients were compared with the manufacturer provided ND,W coefficients. The observed percentage of deviation between the measured and the manufacturer’s ND,W coefficients among all the chambers were found to be in the range of 0.019% and -2.263% as the least and highest, respectively. The observed percentage of deviations for studied chambers were found within the IAEA’s acceptance limit of 1.5% with an exception for three chambers. This observed discrepancy with the IAEA’s acceptance limit for the three chambers out of the twenty chambers, indicates the calibration necessity before using chambers in routine reference dosimetry. In ND,W measurement, the uncertainty Uc is reported with the coverage factor k=1 that providing a level of confidence of approximately 68%.


Author(s):  
Ronaldo Minniti ◽  
Jileen Shobe ◽  
Stephen M Seltzer ◽  
Heather Chen-Mayer ◽  
Steve R Domen

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 092101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fujio Araki ◽  
Tomohiro Kouno ◽  
Takeshi Ohno ◽  
Kiyotaka Kakei ◽  
Fumiaki Yoshiyama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document