scholarly journals The manchester procedure combined with laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy by retroperitoneal tunneling

Author(s):  
Kerem Doğa Seçkin ◽  
Pınar Kadiroğulları ◽  
Hüseyin Kıyak ◽  
Ali Rıza Doğan ◽  
Ömer Lütfi Tapısız
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Izett-Kay ◽  
Philip Rahmanou ◽  
Rufus J. Cartwright ◽  
Natalia Price ◽  
Simon R. Jackson

Abstract Introduction and hypothesis Laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy offers a uterine-sparing alternative to vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension, although randomised comparative data are lacking. This study was aimed at comparing the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension for the treatment of uterine prolapse. Methods A randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension for the treatment of uterine prolapse was performed, with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. The primary outcome was reoperation for apical prolapse. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported mesh complications, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification, Patient Global Impression of Improvement in prolapse symptoms and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Vaginal Symptoms, Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS) and PISQ-12 questionnaires. Results A total of 101 women were randomised and 62 women attended for follow-up at a mean of 100 months postoperatively (range 84–119 months). None reported a mesh-associated complication. The risk of reoperation for apical prolapse was 17.2% following vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and 6.1% following laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy (LSH; relative risk 0.34, 95% CI 0.07–1.68, p = 0.17). Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy was associated with a statistically significantly higher apical suspension (POP-Q point C −5 vs −4.25, p = 0.02) and longer total vaginal length (9 cm vs 6 cm, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the change in ICIQ-VS scores between the two groups (ICIQ-VS change −22 vs −25, p = 0.59). Conclusion Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension have comparable reoperation rates and subjective outcomes. Potential advantages of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy include a lower risk of apical reoperation, greater apical support and increased total vaginal length.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alka Kriplani ◽  
Venus Dalal ◽  
Reeta Mahey ◽  
Garima Kachhawa ◽  
Karishma Thariani ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 252
Author(s):  
U Nagashree ◽  
Meenkashi Sundaram ◽  
P Swetha

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1131-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Lee ◽  
Nirit Rosenblum ◽  
Victor Nitti ◽  
Benjamin M. Brucker

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
İlhan Sanverdi ◽  
Çetin Kılıççı ◽  
Mesut Polat ◽  
Enis Özkaya ◽  
Sami Gökhan Kılıç ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1193-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sissel Hegdahl Oversand ◽  
Anne C. Staff ◽  
Ellen Borstad ◽  
Rune Svenningsen

2011 ◽  
Vol 285 (6) ◽  
pp. 1587-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Liebergall-Wischnitzer ◽  
Assaf Ben-Meir ◽  
Orly Sarid ◽  
Julie Cwikel ◽  
Yuval Lavy

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-185
Author(s):  
Călin Molnar ◽  
Octavian-Sabin Tătaru ◽  
Vlad-Olimpiu Butiurcă ◽  
Varlam-Claudiu Molnar

Abstract Introduction: Pelvic floor hernias are encountered especially in elderly women. A combined genital, bladder, and rectal prolapse poses treatment challenges in aged women. Case presentation: We present the case of an 88 year-old patient, complaining of an intravaginal mass protruding for the last 3 months, rectal prolapse that occurred two weeks before admittance, accompanied by stress incontinence of urine and chronic constipation. Examination revealed a uterine prolapse with cystocele and a fourth grade rectal prolapse. We decided on a perianal and transvaginal approach, performing preliminary dilatation and curettage, cervix amputation, anterior colporrhaphy and colpoperineorrhaphy (Manchester procedure) with perineal rectosigmoidectomy using the LigaSure™ device, and coloanal manual anastomosis. Postoperatively the patient had no symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, bowel movement resumed in the fourth postoperative day, and the patient was discharged after seven days. One month after surgery the patient has both urinary and fecal continence, with no relapse in pelvic organ prolapse. Conclusions: Encountering genital, bladder, and rectal prolapse in the same patient is quite rare, and its treatment can be difficult in aged women. Therefore, a less invasive surgical procedure, using the transvaginal approach, and a genital sparing surgery could be the key in cases like this.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document