Worksite Health Promotion Programs in the U.S.: Factors Associated with Availability and Participation

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Grosch ◽  
Toni Alterman ◽  
Martin R. Petersen ◽  
Lawrence R. Murphy

Purpose. To examine how the availability of and participation in worksite health promotion programs varies as a function of individual (e.g., age), organizational (e.g., occupation), and health (e.g., high blood pressure) characteristics. Availability of worksite programs was also compared to that reported in two previous national surveys of private companies. Design. Data analyzed were from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a national cross-sectional probability sample of the U.S. civilian population. Subjects. Five thousand two hundred nineteen NHIS respondents met the inclusion criteria of (1) being currently employed in a company of at least 50 employees, and (2) completing the NHIS section on worksite health promotion. Measures. Employees indicated the availability of, and their participation in, 33 different types of worksite programs. National Health Interview Survey data were also available regarding general health, blood pressure, body mass index, and medical conditions. Results. Smoking cessation programs had the highest mean availability (43 %), followed by health education programs (31 %) and screening tests (31 %). Overall, availability of worksite programs appeared comparable to that reported in a recent national survey. Participation ranged from 32% for health education programs to 5% for smoking cessation programs. Compared to availability, participation depended less on individual and organizational characteristics. Healthy employees were not consistently more likely to participate in worksite health promotion programs than nonhealthy employees. Conclusions. Although availability of worksite health promotion programs remains high, participation by employees in specific types of programs can vary widely. Attempts to increase participation should look beyond individual, health, and organizational variables, to specific features of the work environment that encourage involvement in health promotion activities.

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Wierenga ◽  
Luuk H Engbers ◽  
Pepijn Van Empelen ◽  
Saskia Duijts ◽  
Vincent H Hildebrandt ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Stiehl ◽  
Namrata Shivaprakash ◽  
Esther Thatcher ◽  
India J. Ornelas ◽  
Shawn Kneipp ◽  
...  

Objective: To determine: (1) What research has been done on health promotion interventions for low-wage workers and (2) what factors are associated with effective low-wage workers’ health promotion programs. Data Source: This review includes articles from PubMed and PsychINFO published in or before July 2016. Study Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: The search yielded 130 unique articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria: (1) being conducted in the United States, (2) including an intervention or empirical data around health promotion among adult low-wage workers, and (3) measuring changes in low-wage worker health. Data Extraction: Central features of the selected studies were extracted, including the theoretical foundation; study design; health promotion intervention content and delivery format; intervention-targeted outcomes; sample characteristics; and work, occupational, and industry characteristics. Data Analysis: Consistent with a scoping review, we used a descriptive, content analysis approach to analyze extracted data. All authors agreed upon emergent themes and 2 authors independently coded data extracted from each article. Results: The results suggest that the research on low-wage workers’ health promotion is limited, but increasing, and that low-wage workers have limited access to and utilization of worksite health promotion programs. Conclusion: Workplace health promotion programs could have a positive effect on low-wage workers, but more work is needed to understand how to expand access, what drives participation, and which delivery mechanisms are most effective.


1990 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Sciacca ◽  
Roger Seehafer ◽  
Roger Reed ◽  
Calvin Berry

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S540-S541
Author(s):  
Judy Kruger ◽  
Michelle Yore ◽  
Harold W Kohl

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. TAHP-1-TAHP-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Grossmeier ◽  
Paul E. Terry ◽  
Aldo Cipriotti ◽  
Jeffrey E. Burtaine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document