Deconstructing Legal Rationality: The Case of Lesbian and Gay Family Relationships: Gilbert Zicklin

2012 ◽  
pp. 67-88

We struggle in this case with the application of equal protection principles to evolving American family law. The challengers—committed lesbian and gay couples, many of them raising children—want the states of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee to recognize their existing committed family relationships as civil marriages. The states respond that these petitions ask this Court to ...


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Murgatroyd ◽  
Brian Cade ◽  
Michael Shooter
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Cook

Abstract. In family systems, it is possible for one to put oneself at risk by eliciting aversive, high-risk behaviors from others ( Cook, Kenny, & Goldstein, 1991 ). Consequently, it is desirable that family assessments should clarify the direction of effects when evaluating family dynamics. In this paper a new method of family assessment will be presented that identifies bidirectional influence processes in family relationships. Based on the Social Relations Model (SRM: Kenny & La Voie, 1984 ), the SRM Family Assessment provides information about the give and take of family dynamics at three levels of analysis: group, individual, and dyad. The method will be briefly illustrated by the assessment of a family from the PIER Program, a randomized clinical trial of an intervention to prevent the onset of psychosis in high-risk young people.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document