Critical values for the Kruskal-Wallis test (equal sample sizes)

2002 ◽  
pp. 51-55
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (S1) ◽  
pp. S697-S701 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Rogus ◽  
Tianxi Cai ◽  
Lee-Jen Wei

2019 ◽  
Vol 354 ◽  
pp. 112-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Célia Nunes ◽  
Gilberto Capistrano ◽  
Dário Ferreira ◽  
Sandra S. Ferreira ◽  
João Tiago Mexia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Hamish Mitchell ◽  
et al.

Figure S1: Location of cross sections through Channel Complex Five; Figure S2: Location of cross-sections taken through Channel Complex Six; Figure S3: (a) The final channel elements of channel complex five (ChC 5) and six (ChC 6) overlain on interval strain rates presented in Pizzi et al. (2020); Table S1: KS test values for channel complex five and six. Critical values based on the two sample sizes (structured (m) and unstructured (n) measurements) and Dmax values for channel complex width, thickness, aspect ratio, and complex-averaged stratigraphic mobility.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Hamish Mitchell ◽  
et al.

Figure S1: Location of cross sections through Channel Complex Five; Figure S2: Location of cross-sections taken through Channel Complex Six; Figure S3: (a) The final channel elements of channel complex five (ChC 5) and six (ChC 6) overlain on interval strain rates presented in Pizzi et al. (2020); Table S1: KS test values for channel complex five and six. Critical values based on the two sample sizes (structured (m) and unstructured (n) measurements) and Dmax values for channel complex width, thickness, aspect ratio, and complex-averaged stratigraphic mobility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document