Transformative Practice

2020 ◽  
pp. 33-56
Author(s):  
Loretta Pyles
2021 ◽  
pp. 003802292097030
Author(s):  
Dev Nath Pathak

Following Alwin Gouldner (1971), it is pertinent to perpetually ask a seemingly all-time relevant question. And the question is, what do sociologists do? In the manner of doing sociology of sociology, and by a polemical resurrection of fragments from the dominant practices of sociologists, this essay brings forth general understanding about the idea of research-writing in contemporary India. It underlines the anomalies in the practice of research-writing, connected with the teaching and training programmes, in a self-referential perspective. The essay substantiates the polemics with analytical reasoning, in order to reveal as to what could be reasons behind this state of sociological research-writings.


Author(s):  
Matthew Martinez

This Open Space article poetically explores the potential of writing as a transformative practice. The interweaving of analytical and creative registers generates an intertextuality that is influenced by Hélène Cixous’s concept of ‘écriture féminine’. This practice is taken as a methodology and contributes to the article through providing examples of the ways in which different forms of writing are capable of pushing boundaries and, in due course, effecting change. In light of the profound impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, I attempt to illustrate how writing across and through genres and disciplinary boundaries might offer hopeful alternative ways of thinking and being.


2021 ◽  
pp. 25-36
Author(s):  
Zuzana Ernst ◽  
Ivana Pilić ◽  
Anne Wiederhold-Daryanavard

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Low ◽  
Sophie Sturup

The theory of being helps us understand the condition of planning in an evanescent, shape-shifting world and how to be a strategic planner in such a world. Martin Heidegger’s investigation of being reveals important and sometimes disconcerting insights into humans and the worlds they inhabit and generate. In this article, we use Heidegger’s framework of thought to reveal what being means for planners and planning. In our investigation, we focus on one theme that seems fundamental to the practice of planning, the transformative impulse, and we reflect on how Heidegger’s thought provides insights into that element. We show how Heidegger, the philosopher of the everyday, overturned the Cartesian dualistic ontology of subject–object, replacing it with the holistic being-in-the-world. We explore how this holistic ontology helps reinterpret transformative practice. We argue that effective transformation of society involves a transformation of being.


2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
Christopher Johannes ◽  
Harry van der Zee ◽  
Carl Lindgren

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document