Teen Children’s Health and Health Care Use

2018 ◽  
pp. 181-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Wolfe ◽  
Maria Perozek
PEDIATRICS ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. e829-e836 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Sills ◽  
S. Shetterly ◽  
S. Xu ◽  
D. Magid ◽  
A. Kempe

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 947-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Shenkman ◽  
J. Pendergast ◽  
D. H. Wegener ◽  
T. Hartzel ◽  
R. Naff ◽  
...  

Medical Care ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 990-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Janicke ◽  
Jack W. Finney ◽  
Anne W. Riley

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (14) ◽  
pp. 1252-1257
Author(s):  
Brinda Sarathy ◽  
Hannah Morris ◽  
Dmitry Tumin ◽  
Cierra Buckman

Objective. To determine whether living in a family with medical financial hardship decreases children’s access to health care. Methods. We identified children aged 4 to 17 years from the 2013 to 2018 National Health Interview Surveys. Medical financial hardship was defined as living in a family where one or more family members had problems paying medical bills in the past 12 months. Results. Of 53 483 children in the analysis, 19% were exposed to medical financial hardship. This was adversely associated with children’s health status and health care use, especially greater odds of delaying care (odds ratio [OR] = 5.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.51-6.19) and having unmet health care needs (OR = 4.43; 95% CI = 4.00-4.91). Conclusions. One fifth of children live in families experiencing medical financial hardship, and this exposure is adversely correlated with child health outcomes even controlling for established measures of socioeconomic status, such as family income, health insurance coverage, and need-based program participation.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. 1119-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Guttmann ◽  
S. A. Shipman ◽  
K. Lam ◽  
D. C. Goodman ◽  
T. A. Stukel

2018 ◽  
Vol 172 (6) ◽  
pp. 513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene A. Wong ◽  
James M. Perrin ◽  
Mark McClellan

1995 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Hughes ◽  
Tania L. Davis ◽  
Richard C. Reynolds

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 106 (Supplement_E1) ◽  
pp. 1256-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Douglas Jones ◽  
Thomas Boat ◽  
Robert Adler ◽  
Harlan R. Gephart ◽  
Lucy M. Osborn ◽  
...  

Some of the challenges of financing pediatric medical education are shared with all medical education; others are specific to pediatrics. The general disadvantage that funding of graduate medical education (GME) is linked to reimbursement for clinical care has uniquely negative consequences for freestanding children's hospitals because they therefore receive little Medicare GME support. This represents both a competitive disadvantage for such hospitals and an aggregate federal underinvestment in children's health care that now amounts to billions of dollars. The need to subsidize medical student and subspecialty education with clinical practice revenue jeopardizes both activities in pediatric departments already burdened by inadequate reimbursement for children's health care and the extra costs of ambulatory care. The challenges of funding are complicated by rising costs as curriculum expands and clinical education moves to ambulatory settings. Controversies over prioritization of resources are inevitable. Solutions require specification of costs of education and a durable mechanism for building consensus within the pediatric community. Pediatrics2000;106(suppl):1256–1269; medical student education, continuing medical education, medical subspecialties, children, pediatrics, health maintenance organizations, managed care, hospital finances, children's hospitals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document