The role of values in grassroots innovations

Author(s):  
Paul Upham ◽  
Paula Bögel ◽  
Katinka Johansen
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Boni ◽  
Aurora López-Fogués ◽  
Álvaro Fernández-Baldor ◽  
Gynna Millan ◽  
Sergio Belda-Miquel

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 868-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Hargreaves ◽  
Sabine Hielscher ◽  
Gill Seyfang ◽  
Adrian Smith

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-137
Author(s):  
Fayaz Ahmad Sheikh ⶁ ◽  
Saradindu Bhaduri

Of late, innovation studies have taken a keen interest in exploring various components of informal sector grassroots innovations. While recognising the immense contribution of this scholarship in sensitising researchers and generating awareness, its connections to policymaking remain inadequate. In the absence of comprehensive policy discussions, the policy makers have often attempted to extrapolate the policies meant for formal sectors to suit the innovation requirements of the informal economy. The diverse, idiosyncratic nature of the informal grassroots innovation processes have not received adequate attention. Keeping in view the divergent motives, underpinnings and the nuances of informal sector grassroots innovations, this paper has undertaken a critical review of the various policy suggestions including intellectual property rights, commercialisation and standardisation on a mass scale, the role of awards and recognition for informal sector innovations, and the importance of feedback and standardisation. Based on ten years of ethnographic research in Kashmir, we identify key thematic insights into policy formulations for these innovations.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnifred R. Louis ◽  
Craig McGarty ◽  
Emma F. Thomas ◽  
Catherine E. Amiot ◽  
Fathali M. Moghaddam

AbstractWhitehouse adapts insights from evolutionary anthropology to interpret extreme self-sacrifice through the concept of identity fusion. The model neglects the role of normative systems in shaping behaviors, especially in relation to violent extremism. In peaceful groups, increasing fusion will actually decrease extremism. Groups collectively appraise threats and opportunities, actively debate action options, and rarely choose violence toward self or others.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document