Returning to Developmental Norms

2021 ◽  
pp. 146-158
Author(s):  
James D. Lock
Keyword(s):  
1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Roach Stewart ◽  
Glenn Weybright

Recent investigations of childrens' developing articulation abilities indicate substantially earlier ages for speech-sound acquisition as compared to traditional norms. Speech-language pathologists in Oregon were asked which developmental norms they used when assessing articulation development. The majority refer to Templin's 1957 investigation instead of more recent norms. Those respondents who did not use developmental norms reported other factors and sources as useful references when determining articulation status. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed.


Author(s):  
Ann Jefferson

This chapter discusses the measurement of genius in Alfred Binet's “measuring scale of intelligence,” which he devised and successively refined between 1905 and 1911 (the year he died). Here, the chapter shows how experimental psychology had its own part to play in forming the basis of the child prodigy. And Binet's invention put France at the forefront of developmental psychology. In the words of the American introduction to the 1916 translation of Les Idées modernes sur les enfants, Binet's measuring scale was a “magnum opus” whose rapid acceptance worldwide was “little less than marvelous.” This invention established a language in which genius could be quantified, and precocity plotted against scientifically established developmental norms.


1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.N.O. Brito ◽  
G.M.N. Alfradique ◽  
C.C.S. Pereira ◽  
C.M.B. Porto ◽  
T.R. Santos

1986 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin MacDonald

This paper attempts to describe links between the transactional or dialectical and the mechanistic models of development and to provide a rationale for why both types are useful. Examples of data sets, deriving principally from the early experience literature, are provided which conform to both, and it is concluded that the applicability of the model for describing behavioral development is strongly influenced by where the individual stands on three empirical dimensions: (1) the relative power of the environments that the individual is exposed to; (2) the plasticity of the individual's behavior; and (3) the deviation of the individual from developmental norms. These factors crucially affect the degree of reciprocity found in organism-environment interactions, and the results suggest that differences between developmental models are reconcilable.


1984 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanford E. Gerber ◽  
Evelyn L. Gong ◽  
Maurice I. Mendel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document