Parental alienation concepts and the law

2021 ◽  
pp. 189-215
Author(s):  
Suzanne Zaccour
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (Especial 2) ◽  
pp. 127-131
Author(s):  
Barbara Maria de Oliveira Vilella ◽  
Thainá Arcanjo da C. Silva

This present article aims to analyze a parental alienation, as a whole, from its formation, to the occurrence and as consequences generated by its practice. Although it is a recent topic in the Brazilian social and legal discussion agenda, regulated by the law 12.318/2010, it is already something that occurs for years, which makes it such a controversial and complex subject, because it involves social and family, among them the unfriendly divorce between the genitors, issues that mainly affect the lesser, in a sense, helpless, causing him physical and mental damages, as covered in this study. It is also verified in this article, concrete jurisprudence cases and bibliographic concepts


2009 ◽  
pp. 40-52
Author(s):  
Adele Cavedon

- The law of February 8, 2006 has theoretically sanctioned the principle of parental dichotomy, putting the two parents at the same level; however the Italian judicial system often seems (to represent an optimal field to increase) to sharpen the contrast that it pretends to reduce as solutions (adapted) suitable for single, rather than for the whole family system, are often proposed. The partition of children is a specific case; they sometimes are divided among parents. In such context a particular type of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) can arise which can be defined as inter-crossed or bilateral. In this work I intend to provide useful information to characterize PAS, although still little is known and studied in Italy, through a review of the existing literature and some suggestions that are the result of my experience in the field, offering a diagnosis of the phenomenon through the observation of minor children and their families' dynamics.Key words: separation, shared confidence, Parental Alienation Syndrome


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document