Pankhurst, Emmeline (1858–1928)

Author(s):  
Lisa Weihman

Emmeline Pankhurst was born Emmeline Goulden in Manchester, England. One of the most prominent activists in the suffrage movement, Pankhurst founded both the Women’s Franchise League (1883), and the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU, 1903). She married Richard Pankhurst (1834–1898), a barrister, in 1879, and had five children: Christabel (1880–1958); Sylvia (1882–1960); Francis Henry (1884–1888); Adela (1885–1961); and Henry Francis (1889–1910). All three of the Pankhurst daughters became political activists in socialist and suffrage organizations. In her autobiography, My Own Story, Pankhurst writes, "Men make the moral code and they expect women to accept it. They have decided that it is entirely right and proper for men to fight for their liberties and their rights, but that it is not right and proper for women to fight for theirs" (1914: 268). Pankhurst’s work connected her with many of the leading socialist, labor, and suffrage activists of her day, including Annie Besant, Keir Hardie, William Morris, Eleanor Marx, and Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence. In 1894 Pankhurst investigated conditions at the Chorlton Workhouse, which galvanized her activism. "I thought I had been a suffragist before I became a Poor Law Guardian, but now I began to think about the vote in women’s hands not only as a right but as a desperate necessity" (ibid.: 28).

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Christopher Fletcher

The suffragette in the dock at Bow Street police court is one of the emblematic scenes of the “votes for women” agitation. She usually stood alone in the prisoners' box, facing the magistrate, flanked by tables lined with lawyers and police officials and backed by benches full of friends and supporters, newspaper reporters, and ordinary spectators. Notwithstanding the state's claims of legal equality and judicial impartiality, she seemed to be engaged in an unequal contest speaking truth to unbending masculine authority. She was powerless to alter the outcome, a guilty verdict and a spell of imprisonment. This scene, like those of the protester arrested in the streets and the hunger striker being forcibly fed in prison, underlines the spectacular nature of suffrage militancy. Yet its very power to seize and hold our attention can obscure the complex interactions and effects that made militancy such a profoundly ambiguous moment in the intertwined histories of the women's suffrage movement and the Liberal-ruled Edwardian state.Recent research has displaced the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) from its once central place in suffrage history. Jill Liddington, Jill Norris, and Jo Vellacott have recovered the very important contributions of radical and democratic feminists to the movement. In recounting the efforts of moderate women's suffragists, Claire Hirshfield, Leslie Parker Hume, and others have helped to paint a much more complex picture of the high politics of franchise reform. Historians have also begun to examine the distinct experiences of the movement in Ireland and Scotland.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Morris ◽  
May Morris
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Morris ◽  
May Morris
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Morris ◽  
May Morris
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Morris ◽  
May Morris
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Morris ◽  
May Morris
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document