Acting Technique, Jacques Lecoq and Embodied Meaning

Author(s):  
Rick Kemp
2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-63
Author(s):  
Emily E. Wilcox

Zhuli xiaojie (adapted from Strindberg's Miss Julie) and Xin bi tian gao (from Ibsen's Hedda Gabler) are two works in a recent series of intercultural xiqu productions by playwrights William Huizhu Sun and Faye Chunfang Fei. In these works, the xiqu body serves as a medium for theatrical expression, where music, costume, movement, and props come together in a super-expressive acting technique that foregrounds qing (情), or sentiment. In these adaptations, the xiqu body compensates for what is necessarily cut from the text in the transformation from spoken drama to xiqu performance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Ciavatta

AbstractIn this paper it is argued that the conceptions of embodied meaning and of intuition that Hegel appeals to in the Aesthetics anticipate some of Merleau-Ponty’s insights concerning the distinctive character of pre-conceptual, sensuous forms of meaning. It is argued that, for Hegel, our aesthetic experience of the beautiful is such that we cannot readily differentiate in it the purportedly distinct roles that sensation and thought play, and so that the account of sensuous intuition operative here differs from the one appealed to in more familiar, ‘intellectualist’ conceptions that are premised upon our being able to make such a distinction. Some of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological insights are brought to bear to help support and illuminate some of the implications of Hegel’s conception of such sensuously embodied meaning.


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 644-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur M. Glenberg ◽  
David A. Robertson ◽  
Michael P. Kaschak ◽  
Alan J. Malter

Standard models of cognition are built from abstract, amodal, arbitrary symbols, and the meanings of those symbols are given solely by their interrelations. The target article (Glenberg 1997t) argues that these models must be inadequate because meaning cannot arise from relations among abstract symbols. For cognitive representations to be meaningful they must, at the least, be grounded; but abstract symbols are difficult, if not impossible, to ground. As an alternative, the target article developed a framework in which representations are grounded in perception and action, and hence are embodied. Recent work (Glenberg & Robertson 1999; 2000; Glenberg & Kaschak 2002; Kaschak & Glenberg 2000) extends this framework to language.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Wahman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document