The School of Alexius Meinong

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Albertazzi ◽  
Dale Jacquette ◽  
Roberto Poli
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Reisenzein ◽  
Irina Mchitarjan

According to Heider, some of his ideas about common-sense psychology presented in The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations ( Heider, 1958 ) originally came from his academic teacher, Alexius Meinong. However, Heider makes no reference to Meinong in his book. To clarify Meinong’s influence on Heider, we compare Heider’s explication of common-sense psychology with Meinong’s writings, in particular those on ethics. Our results confirm that Heider’s common-sense psychology is informed by Meinong’s psychological analyses in several respects: Heider adopts aspects of Meinong’s theory of emotion, his theory of value, and his theory of responsibility attribution. In addition, Heider more or less continues Meinong’s method of psychological inquiry. Thus, even without Meinong’s name attached, many aspects of Meinong’s psychology found their way into today’s social psychology via Heider. Unknowingly, some of us have been Meinongians all along.


1968 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roderick M. Chisholm ◽  
Rudolf Kindinger
Keyword(s):  

1922 ◽  
Vol 34 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilh. M. Frankl
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-138
Author(s):  
Lawrence R. Carleton ◽  
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 1063
Author(s):  
Robert Anchor ◽  
David F. Lindenfeld

Dialogue ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-298
Author(s):  
Peter H. Hess

In the sixth chapter of his Theory of Knowledge Roderick Chisholm refers to an example suggested by Alexius Meinong in order to show that the traditional definition of knowledge is in need of some modification. In this paper I should like to show that Chisholm's argument rests on a mistaken assumption as to what an individual's doxastic responsibilities are.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document