Conditional Discriminations and Stimulus Equivalence Classes

2016 ◽  
pp. 177-195
1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Egli ◽  
Beth Joseph ◽  
Travis Thompson

The transfer of social attributions within stimulus-equivalence classes comprised of photographs of children was examined. Five children (mean age: 4 yr., 2 mo.) were taught conditional discriminations sufficient for the emergence of two 3-member equivalence classes (A1-B1-C1 and A2-B2-C2). Social attributions were established by using two photographs to identify fictional children who could facilitate (B1) or prevent (B2) the participant's reinforcement on a computer game. Transfer of attribution was assessed by asking the participants questions regarding predicted social behaviors by children in all six photographs. One set of questions pertained explicitly to the response-options of the computer game; a second set referred to other prosocial and antisocial behaviors. Three children chose photographs in response to questions consistent with their experience with members B1 and B2 of the shared equivalence class when the questions pertained to the computer game. One subject also selected photographs in response to questions about predicted prosocial and antisocial behavior which reflected her experience with the B1 and B2 photographs.


Author(s):  
Guro Granerud ◽  
Erik Arntzen

AbstractIn the present study, two typically developing 4-year-old children, Pete and Joe, were trained six conditional discriminations and tested for the formation of three 3-member equivalence classes. Pete and Joe did not establish the AC relation within 600 trials and were given two conditions of preliminary training, including naming of stimuli with two different stimulus sets. Pete started with preliminary training with common naming of stimuli, followed by conditional-discrimination training and testing for emergent relations, and continued with preliminary training on individual naming of stimuli, followed by the same training and testing as described previously. Joe experienced the same conditions but in reversed order. Pete responded in accordance with equivalence in the second round in the condition with common naming. In the first round of testing in the condition with individual naming, he responded in accordance with equivalence. In the condition with individual naming, Joe did not respond in accordance with stimulus equivalence but established all of the directly trained relations during training. In the condition with common naming, he responded in accordance with equivalence in the first round of testing. The results from the experiment support earlier findings that both common and individual naming could facilitate the emergence of equivalence classes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 912-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asieh Abolpour Mofrad ◽  
Anis Yazidi ◽  
Hugo L. Hammer ◽  
Erik Arntzen

Stimulus equivalence (SE) and projective simulation (PS) study complex behavior, the former in human subjects and the latter in artificial agents. We apply the PS learning framework for modeling the formation of equivalence classes. For this purpose, we first modify the PS model to accommodate imitating the emergence of equivalence relations. Later, we formulate the SE formation through the matching-to-sample (MTS) procedure. The proposed version of PS model, called the equivalence projective simulation (EPS) model, is able to act within a varying action set and derive new relations without receiving feedback from the environment. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that the field of equivalence theory in behavior analysis has been linked to an artificial agent in a machine learning context. This model has many advantages over existing neural network models. Briefly, our EPS model is not a black box model, but rather a model with the capability of easy interpretation and flexibility for further modifications. To validate the model, some experimental results performed by prominent behavior analysts are simulated. The results confirm that the EPS model is able to reliably simulate and replicate the same behavior as real experiments in various settings, including formation of equivalence relations in typical participants, nonformation of equivalence relations in language-disabled children, and nodal effect in a linear series with nodal distance five. Moreover, through a hypothetical experiment, we discuss the possibility of applying EPS in further equivalence theory research.


2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio C. de Rose ◽  
Matheus Hidalgo ◽  
Mariliz Vasconcellos

1998 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Plaud ◽  
George A. Gaither ◽  
Michael Franklin ◽  
Louise A. Weller ◽  
Jeannie Barth

2018 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elberto A. Plazas ◽  
Carlos-Wilcen Villamil

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document