scholarly journals Un estudio de la genealogía madre-hija de Irigaray en Brush Back de Sara Paretsky.

Author(s):  
Candidate Maryam Imani ◽  
Zohreh Ramin.
Keyword(s):  

Luce Irigaray, la filósofa feminista psicolingüista, afirma que la subjetividad femenina es alcanzable a través de algunas conductas activas de las cuales la genealogía madre-hija es la más prominente. El conocido mito de Perséfone y su madre, Demeter, es la base inspiradora de la relación madre e hija de Irigaray, que también se puede identificar en el Brush Back de Sara Paretsky. Analizar las similitudes y las diferencias entre la noción de Irigaray de la genealogía de madre e hija en el mito y la forma en que Paretsky utiliza el tema en su novela, sería el resultado concluyente de este estudio que también recordaría indirectamente al lector la necesidad de reconocer la genealogía madre-hija para construir una cultura mundial.

Hypatia ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-140
Author(s):  
Kate Ince
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Margaret Kinsman
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Natalie Hevener Kaufman ◽  
Carrollee Kaufman Hevener
Keyword(s):  

Hypatia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 412-436
Author(s):  
William Robert

Antigone fascinates G. W. F. Hegel and Luce Irigaray, both of whom turn to her in their explorations and articulations of ethics. Hegel and Irigaray make these re-turns to Antigone through the double and related lenses of nature and sexual difference. This essay investigates these figures of Antigone and the accompanying ethical accounts of nature and sexual difference as a way of examining Irigaray's complex relation to and creative uses of Hegel's thought.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-155
Author(s):  
Andrea Wheeler

This paper explores how participation and sustainability are being addressed by architects within the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme in the UK. The intentions promoted by the programme are certainly ambitious, but the ways to fulfil these aims are ill-explored. Simply focusing on providing innovative learning technologies, or indeed teaching young people about physical sustainability features in buildings, will not necessarily teach them the skills they will need to respond to the environmental and social challenges of a rapidly changing world. However, anticipating those skills is one of the most problematic issues of the programme. The involvement of young people in the design of schools is used to suggest empowerment, place-making and to promote social cohesion but this is set against government design literature which advocates for exemplars, standard layouts and best practice, all leading to forms of standardisation. The potentials for tokenistic student involvement and conflict with policy aims are evident. This paper explores two issues: how to foster in young people an ethic towards future generations, and the role of co-design practices in this process. Michael Oakeshott calls teaching the conversation of mankind. In this paper, I look at the philosophy of Hannah Arendt, Emmanuel Levinas, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Luce Irigaray to argue that investigating the ethical dilemmas of the programme through critical dialogue with students offers an approach to meeting government objectives, building sustainable schools, and fostering sustainable citizenship.


Religions ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
Rebekah Pryor

Guided by the hopeful possibilities of birth, breath and beginning that Hannah Arendt and Luce Irigaray variously articulate, this paper examines the lullaby as an expressive form that emerges (in a variety of contexts as distinct as medieval Christendom and contemporary art) as narrative between natality and mortality. With narrative understood as praxis according to Arendt’s schema, and articulated in what Irigaray might designate as an interval between two different sexuate subjects, the lullaby (and the voice that sings it) is found to be a telling of what it is to be human, and a hopeful reminder of our capacity both for self-affection and -preservation, and for meeting and nurturing others in their difference.


Author(s):  
Diana María Ivizate González

En este artículo se analiza lo que hemos dado en llamar “el discurso de la insubordinación femenina”, a partir de un conjunto de autoras contemporáneas cuyas obras sustentan una intención transformadora de la interpretación psicoanalítica y social que se ha hecho de las mujeres a lo largo de la historia. Las autoras que constituyen el centro de nuestro estudio son: Luce Irigaray, Judith Butler, Carole Pateman, entre otras. En segundo lugar, se realiza un contraste entre el discurso de las autoras estudiadas y las fuentes filosóficas y psicoanalíticas que lo inspiraron y provocaron (Rousseau, Locke, Filmer, Freud), con el fin de esclarecer qué puntos quedarían por resolver en el debate feminista y cuál es su vínculo con la realidad social que estamos viviendo. Desde el punto de vista lingüístico, proponemos un análisis trans-disciplinar de los textos (basado en las ideas aportadas por Norman Fairclough) para añadir, si cabe, nuevas interpretaciones que puedan abrir un nuevo camino al entendimiento de la situación de las mujeres en el momento actual.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document