Conservation, Ecology, and Management of Catfish: The Second International Symposium

<em>Abstract</em>.—Channel catfish <em>Ictalurus punctatus</em> are a major recreational and commercially important large river species. However, anthropogenic activities have heavily degraded the majority of riverine catfish habitats. To maintain catfish populations, an understanding of channel catfish early-life habitat use is necessary. We quantified habitat use of juvenile channel catfish in the middle Mississippi River from 2004 through 2007 by trawling in main channel, channel border, island, and artificial structure habitat (i.e., river training structures or wing dikes) features throughout the sampling reach (<EM>N</EM> = 878 trawls; <EM>N</EM> = 538 juvenile channel catfish). Channel catfish occurred most frequently in island and off-channel habitats. Few juvenile channel catfish were trawled in the main channel. All macrohabitat features were used by a broad size range of juvenile channel catfish, with the exception of the main channel, where only larger juvenile channel catfish were captured. Within each habitat, juvenile channel catfish catch rates were highest in sand substrate, low velocity, and shallow depths. Channel catfish in the middle Mississippi River use a variety of habitats during early life. Maintaining existing habitats, creating habitats with these attributes, and coupling this with proper management will foster sustainability of the channel catfish population at current commercial and recreational fishing levels in the middle Mississippi River.

2010 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 1060-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinton E. Phelps ◽  
Sara J. Tripp ◽  
James E. Garvey ◽  
David P. Herzog ◽  
David E. Ostendorf ◽  
...  

<em>Abstract.-</em>Little published information exists on the utility of tournament and anglercatch data for assessing sizes and numbers of channel catfish <em>Ictalurus punctatus</em>. We compared channel catfish caught concurrently from May-August 2006 by small tournament anglers, creel-surveyed anglers, and soybean-baited tandem hoop nets (nets) in Lake Manawa, an 800 ac urban lake in Council Bluffs, Iowa. Mean total length of channel catfish caught was lowest in the nets, intermediate for creel-surveyed anglers, and highest for tournament anglers. Tournament anglers selected against small channel catfish (i.e., RSD S-Q: 11-16 in), selected for intermediate-sized channel catfish (RSD Q-P: 16-24 in), and caught similar proportions of large channel catfish (RSD P-M: 24-28 in) as compared to creel-surveyed anglers. Comparisons of angler and net catch rates by size categories revealed that both tournament and creel-surveyed anglers selected against small channel catfish, but overestimated both intermediate and larger channel catfish. We believe there is some utility and cost-savings benefits associated with using angler-caught channel catfish data for making management decisions, but biases need to be considered and more information on comparisons between angler caught channel catfish and sampling data are warranted.


<em>Abstract</em>.—Using Long Term Resource Monitoring Program data collected from impounded (Pool 26) and unimpounded (Open River) reaches of the upper Mississippi River, we investigated population dynamics of flathead catfish <em>Pylodictis olivaris</em>, channel catfish <em>Ictalurus punctatus</em>, and blue catfish <em>I. furcatus</em> from random sites located in side channel border (SCB) and main channel border (MCB) habitats. Objectives were to (1) compare trends (1993–2007) of three catfishes collected in Pool 26 and Open River reaches of the upper Mississippi River, and (2) provide needed information to managers on population dynamics through time using a binary gear approach of active (i.e., daytime electrofishing) and passive gears (hoopnetting). Active gears resulted in a higher catch per unit effort (CPUE) of all catfishes in each habitat–reach combination as compared to passive gears. Passive gears resulted in negligible catches of blue catfish and flathead catfishes (e.g., mean of <1 fish/net night). Catch per unit effort using active gear resulted in a greater number of channel catfish captured in Pool 26 compared to the Open River, with Open River SCB habitat having the lowest CPUE in most years. Blue catfish in the Open River had a higher CPUE using active gear as compared to Pool 26, with the Open River MCB having the greatest CPUE. Flathead catfish had a higher CPUE in MCB habitat compared to SCB habitat, with the Open River MCB having the highest CPUE in most years. However, declining trends in flathead catfish appears to be occurring in Open River habitats while trends in flathead catfish appear to be slightly increasing in Pool 26. The most common length-classes captured were substock and stock-sized fish regardless of habitat, species, or reach. Trends for channel catfish were easily determined due to high catch rates; however, more monitoring and enhanced sampling is needed to accurately assess flathead catfish and blue catfish trends and to accurately determine demographics for all three species.


2004 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 1033-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith L. Hurley ◽  
Robert J. Sheehan ◽  
Roy C. Heidinger ◽  
Paul S. Wills ◽  
Bob Clevenstine

Copeia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 580-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Bueltmann ◽  
Quinton E. Phelps

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document