AbstractIn the routine laboratory, 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) is the fixative of choice. However, formalin is a human carcinogen. To the best of our knowledge, neutral honey, not natural or artificial honey, has not been tested to fix histological tissues. This study aimed to examine the efficiency of neutral buffered honey and other types of honey fixatives to fix histological tissues. The most two natural common Omani honey were used as fixatives, namely Sumar and date. We tested samples of rat liver, kidney, and stomach. Nine types of fixatives were used. All tissues were treated equally. The evaluation was performed blindly by three senior biomedical scientists who work in a histopathology laboratory. Hematoxylin and eosin showed adequate staining in all groups when compared to 10% NBF. The intensity and specificity of Jones Methenamine silver stain in 10% Sumer and Date honey and 10% alcoholic Sumer honey showed similar findings of 10% NBF. The specificity and intensity of all groups for Periodic acid–Schiff were comparable with 10% neutral buffered formalin accepts for 10% Sumer honey and 10% Alcoholic Date honey. However, all honey groups showed weak staining for the reticulin fibers using Gordon and Sweets method. Vimentin showed comparable findings with 10% NBF as there were no significant differences. The findings of this study are promising. Further in depth research on honey as a possible safe substitute fixative for formalin should be conducted.
An Allochrome Periodic Acid-Methenamine Silver Stain for Demonstrating Mycobacteria in Tissue Sections
