scholarly journals ESTIMATION OF OBJECT SURFACE REFLECTION PROPERTIES BASED ON MEASURING OF SPECTRAL REFLECTION DATA

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 943-950
Author(s):  
Norihiro TANAKA ◽  
Jae-Yong WOO ◽  
Tomohiro SARASHINA ◽  
Kosuke MOCHIZUKI
Keyword(s):  
Object Surface ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Spectral Reflection ◽  
Reflection Data

scholarly journals Muting the noise cone in near‐surface reflection data: An example from southeastern Kansas

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1332-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Baker ◽  
Don W. Steeples ◽  
Matt Drake
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Hydrocarbon Exploration ◽  
Seismic Reflection Profile ◽  
Seismic Data Processing ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Data Volume ◽  
Total Data

A 300-m near‐surface seismic reflection profile was collected in southeastern Kansas to locate a fault(s) associated with a recognized stratigraphic offset on either side of a region of unexposed bedrock. A substantial increase in the S/N ratio of the final stacked section was achieved by muting all data arriving in time after the airwave. Methods of applying traditional seismic data processing techniques to near‐surface data (200 ms of data or less) often differ notably from hydrocarbon exploration‐scale processing (3–4 s of data or more). The example of noise cone muting used is contrary to normal exploration‐scale seismic data processing philosophy, which is to include all data containing signal. The noise cone mute applied to the data removed more than one‐third of the total data volume, some of which contains signal. In this case, however, the severe muting resulted in a higher S/N ratio in the final stacked section, even though some signal could be identified within the muted data. This example supports the suggestion that nontraditional techniques sometimes need to be considered when processing near‐surface seismic data.

The sensitivity of Born inversion to the choice of reference velocity: A simple example

Geophysics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. Weglein ◽  
S. H. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Trade Off ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Born Model ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Reference Velocity ◽  
Perturbative Methods ◽  
The Difference

We examine the sensitivity of the Born model to the input background velocity. We use a one‐dimensional analytic example to point out the difference between a corrective procedure and merely a perturbative one. We examine various aspects of the sensitivity issue, including the trade‐off between velocity determination and mapping of reflector location. Although this problem is discussed within the context of the Born model, it is an issue common to all perturbative methods (e.g., migration methods) which transform surface reflection data into a map of subsurface reflectors.

scholarly journals Reconstructing the primary reflections in seismic data by Marchenko redatuming and convolutional interferometry

Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. Q15-Q26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Angelo Meles ◽  
Kees Wapenaar ◽  
Andrew Curtis
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Model ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Reference Velocity ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Recorded Data

State-of-the-art methods to image the earth’s subsurface using active-source seismic reflection data involve reverse time migration. This and other standard seismic processing methods such as velocity analysis provide best results only when all waves in the data set are primaries (waves reflected only once). A variety of methods are therefore deployed as processing to predict and remove multiples (waves reflected several times); however, accurate removal of those predicted multiples from the recorded data using adaptive subtraction techniques proves challenging, even in cases in which they can be predicted with reasonable accuracy. We present a new, alternative strategy to construct a parallel data set consisting only of primaries, which is calculated directly from recorded data. This obviates the need for multiple prediction and removal methods. Primaries are constructed by using convolutional interferometry to combine the first-arriving events of upgoing and direct-wave downgoing Green’s functions to virtual receivers in the subsurface. The required upgoing wavefields to virtual receivers are constructed by Marchenko redatuming. Crucially, this is possible without detailed models of the earth’s subsurface reflectivity structure: Similar to the most migration techniques, the method only requires surface reflection data and estimates of direct (nonreflected) arrivals between the virtual subsurface sources and the acquisition surface. We evaluate the method on a stratified synclinal model. It is shown to be particularly robust against errors in the reference velocity model used and to improve the migrated images substantially.

Waveform tomography at a groundwater contamination site: Surface reflection data

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. G45-G55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuchun Gao ◽  
Alan Levander ◽  
R. Gerhard Pratt ◽  
Colin A. Zelt ◽  
Gian-Luigi Fradelizio
Keyword(s):  
Groundwater Contamination ◽  
Nonaqueous Phase Liquids ◽  
Seismic Profiles ◽  
Lateral Velocity ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Traveltime Tomography ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Waveform Tomography

We have applied acoustic-waveform tomography to 45 2D seismic profiles to image the 3D geometry of a buried paleochannel at a groundwater-contamination site at Hill Air Force Base in Utah. The paleochannel, which is incised into an alluvium-covered clay aquitard, acts as a trap for dense nonaqueous-phase liquids (DNAPLs) that contaminate the shallowest groundwater system in the study area. The 2D profiles were extracted from a 3D surface reflection data set. First-arrival traveltime tomography provided initial velocity models for the waveform tomography. We inverted for six frequency components in the band [Formula: see text] of the direct and refracted waves to produce 45 2D velocity models. The flanks and bottom of a channel with a maximum depth of about [Formula: see text] were well modeled in most of the 45 parallel 2D slices, which allowed us to construct a 3D image of the channel by combining and interpolating between the 45 image slices. The 3D model of the channel will be useful for siting extraction wells within the site remediation program. The alluvium that fills the channel showed marked vertical and lateral velocity heterogeneity. Traveltime tomography and waveform tomography can be complementary approaches. Used together, they can provide high-resolution images of complicated shallow structures.

scholarly journals Interferometric identification of surface-related multiples

Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. Q41-Q52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Boullenger ◽  
Deyan Draganov
Keyword(s):  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Interferometric Method ◽  
Feedback Information ◽  
Arrival Times ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Multiple Prediction ◽  
Virtual Events

The theory of seismic interferometry predicts that crosscorrelations of recorded seismic responses at two receivers yield an estimate of the interreceiver seismic response. The interferometric process applied to surface-reflection data involves the summation, over sources, of crosscorrelated traces, and it allows retrieval of an estimate of the interreceiver reflection response. In particular, the crosscorrelations of the data with surface-related multiples in the data produce the retrieval of pseudophysical reflections (virtual events with the same kinematics as physical reflections in the original data). Thus, retrieved pseudophysical reflections can provide feedback information about the surface multiples. From this perspective, we have developed a data-driven interferometric method to detect and predict the arrival times of surface-related multiples in recorded reflection data using the retrieval of virtual data as diagnosis. The identification of the surface multiples is based on the estimation of source positions in the stationary-phase regions of the retrieved pseudophysical reflections, thus not necessarily requiring sources and receivers on the same grid. We have evaluated the method of interferometric identification with a two-layer acoustic example and tested it on a more complex synthetic data set. The results determined that we are able to identify the prominent surface multiples in a large range of the reflection data. Although missing near offsets proved to cause major problems in multiple-prediction schemes based on convolutions and inversions, missing near offsets does not impede our method from identifying surface multiples. Such interferometric diagnosis could be used to control the effectiveness of conventional multiple-removal schemes, such as adaptive subtraction of multiples predicted by convolution of the data.

Transmission‐reflection tomography: Application to reverse VSP data

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 884-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijian Mao ◽  
Graham W. Stuart
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Profile ◽  
Transmission Tomography ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Lower Velocity ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Vsp Data ◽  
Reflection Tomography ◽  
Transmission And Reflection

A multiphase tomographic algorithm is presented that allows 2-D and 3-D slowness (inverse of velocity) and variable reflector depth to be reconstructed simultaneously from both transmission and reflection traveltimes. We analyze the ambiguity in the determination of velocity and depth in transmission and reflection data and realize that depth perturbation is more sensitive to reflection traveltime anomalies than slowness perturbation, whereas the reverse is true of transmission traveltime anomalies. Because of the constraints on velocity and depth provided by the different wave types, this algorithm reduces the ambiguity substantially between velocity and depth prevalent in reflection tomography and also avoids the undetermined problem in transmission tomography. The linearized inversion was undertaken iteratively by decoupling velocity parameters from reflector depths. A rapid 2-D and 3-D ray‐tracing algorithm is used to compute transmission and reflection traveltimes and partial derivatives with respect to slowness and reflector depth. Both depth and velocity are parameterized in terms of cubic B‐spline functions. Synthetic examples indicate the improvement in tomographic results when both transmission and reflection times are included. The method has been applied to a reverse vertical seismic profile (VSP) data set recorded on the British coal measures along a crossed‐linear array. Traveltimes were picked automatically by the simultaneous determination of time delays and stacking weights using a waveform matching technique. The tomographic inversion of the observed reverse VSP images two fault‐zones of lower velocity than the surrounding media. The location of the faults was confirmed by near‐by reflection lines. The technique can be applied to offset VSPs or reverse VSPs and coincident VSP and surface reflection data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document