scholarly journals Measuring Systemic Liquidity Risk and the Cost of Liquidity Insurance

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (194) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Severo ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Mingyuan Sun

The synergy between deposit-taking and lending is the specialness of banking institutions as financial intermediaries. The activities from both balance sheet and off-balance sheet could share the cost of holding liquid assets, which is based on the fact that draw-downs on loan commitments and withdrawals on deposits are not perfectly correlated. However, it matters to reveal the dynamic connections between the two sources of liquidity risk for the purpose of analyzing the real impact on individual banks from a more microscopic perspective. As the evidence shows in this study, a winner-take-all effect is hidden in the synergy and could cause local double cash outflow from particular banks. It also provides new insights on liquidity management of commercial banks.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 1550014 ◽  
Author(s):  
BERT-JAN NAUTA

Traditionally derivatives have been valued in isolation. The balance sheet of which a derivative position is part, was not included in the valuation. Recently however, aspects of the valuation have been revised to incorporate certain elements of the balance sheet. Examples are the debt valuation adjustment which incorporates default risk of the bank holding the derivative, and the funding valuation adjustment that some authors have proposed to include the cost of funding into the valuation. This paper investigates the valuation of derivatives as part of a balance sheet. In particular, the paper considers funding costs, default risk and liquidity risk. A valuation framework is developed under the elastic funding assumption. This assumption states that funding costs reflect the quality of the assets, and any change in asset composition is immediately reflected in the funding costs. The result is that funding costs should not affect the value of derivatives. Furthermore, a new model for pricing liquidity risk is described. The paper highlights that the liquidity spread, used for discounting cashflows of illiquid assets, should be expressed in terms of the liquidation value (LV) of the asset, and the probability that the institution holding the asset needs to liquidate its assets.


Author(s):  
Yasir Salih ◽  
Riaman Riaman ◽  
Komar Komar ◽  
Alit Kartiwa

Exogenous liquidity risk measurement is a measurement of liquidity risk that affects all market participants and is not affected by the actions of any other actors. Exogenous liquidity risk measurement is usually called the Cost of Liquidity (COL). The main problem is how the level of liquidity of one currency against other currencies and the effect of liquidity risk on VaR (Value at Risk) on a single asset. This thesis examines the importance of liquidity risk on a single asset. Combining basic VaR and liquidity risk will result in more effective calculations. The model used is to add the basic VaR value with the Cost of Liquidity (COL) or also called Liquidity VaR (L-VaR). The calculation results show the different effects of liquidity for each country's currency. Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) is the currency that has the highest liquidity component compared to the Japanese Yen (JPY) and the Thai Baht (THB). The lower the liquidity component of a currency, the currency is very liquid, and the Japanese Yen (JPY) is the most liquid currency compared to the Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) and the Thai Baht (THB).


2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hernán Ortiz-Molina ◽  
Gordon M. Phillips

AbstractWe show that firms with more illiquid real assets have a higher cost of capital. This effect is stronger when real illiquidity arises from lower within-industry acquisition activity. Real asset illiquidity increases the cost of capital more for firms that face more competition, have less access to external capital, or are closer to default, and for those facing negative demand shocks. The effect of real asset illiquidity is distinct from that of firms’ stock illiquidity or systematic liquidity risk. These results suggest that real asset illiquidity reduces firms’ operating flexibility and through this channel their cost of capital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document