scholarly journals The Effect of Causal Strength on the Use of Causal and Similarity-based Information in Feature Inference

Author(s):  
Rachel Stephens ◽  
Daniel Navarro ◽  
John Dunn ◽  
Michael Lee
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Stephan ◽  
Sarah Placì ◽  
Michael R. Waldmann

Most psychological studies focused on how people reason about generative causation, in which a cause produces an effect. We here study the prevention of effects both on the general and singular level. A general prevention query might ask how strongly a vaccine is expected to reduce the risk of contracting COVID-19, whereas a singular prevention query might ask whether the absence of COVID-19 in a specific vaccinated person actually resulted from this person’s vaccination. We propose a computational model answering how knowledge about the general strength of a preventive cause can be used to assess whether a preventive link is instantiated in a singular case. We also discuss how psychological models of causal strength learning relate to mathematical models of vaccination efficacy used in medical research. The results of an experimentsuggest that many, but not all people differentiate between preventive strength and singular prevention queries, in line with the formal model.


Author(s):  
Steffen Nestler ◽  
Gernot von Collani

Previous research has shown that conditional counterfactuals are positively related to the magnitude of creeping determinism. Unlike previous experiments which show this increased hindsight bias to occur after exceptional antecedents, we investigated another possible factor, namely a prior activation of a counterfactual mind-set. We investigated our prediction using a hypothetical scenario. Prior to reading the hindsight scenario some participants were asked to solve a scrambled-sentence test including conditional counterfactual sentences. Results of two experiments were consistent with our predictions: Participants that solved the scrambled-sentence test perceived the outcome to be more inevitable than participants in a no-outcome control condition and participants in a no-prime control condition. Furthermore, we found that this increase in creeping determinism was mediated by the perceived causal strength of the target antecedent for the occurrence of the outcome, and that the priming-effect did not occur when an unconditional counterfactual mind-set was activated before. The results are interpreted as supporting a causal-model theory of the hindsight bias.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document