scholarly journals Translation and validation of the inflammatory bowel disease fatigue (IBD-F) patient self-assessment questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
Ariel Liebert ◽  
Aleksandra Wileńska ◽  
Władysława Czuber-Dochan ◽  
Maria Kłopocka
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1398-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wladyslawa Czuber-Dochan ◽  
Christine Norton ◽  
Paul Bassett ◽  
Stuart Berliner ◽  
Francesca Bredin ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A178.1-A178
Author(s):  
WJ Czuber-Dochan ◽  
C Norton ◽  
S Berliner ◽  
F Bredin ◽  
M Darvell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S250-S251
Author(s):  
A Busacca ◽  
E Sinagra ◽  
L Guida ◽  
L Carrozza ◽  
M Melodia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During the COVID-19 outbreaks many IBD clinics in Italy adopted a remote monitoring approach both to ensure an adequate follow-up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and respect the rules of social distancing, while access to hospital was restricted. Aim of the study was to perform a survey on IBD patients submitted to remote monitoring in our tertiary referral center in order to assess adherence and patients’ perceptions and satisfaction as well as their opinions for future monitoring. Changes in disease activity and Quality of Life were also evaluated. Methods Consecutive patients with IBD scheduled for follow-up visits were switched to remote monitoring through e-mail from March 2020 to February 2021, Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire focusing on 3 elements of the intervention: (1) self-assessment questions, (2) action plans, and (3) educational messages. With regards to self-assessment questions, we used the SIBDQ (to evaluate the QoL) and the IBDSI (to evaluate symptoms as patients’ reported outcomes). All patient sent by email results of blood texts: ESR, CRP, CBC, faecal calprotectin, ferritin, serum iron. HBI Index and Mayo UC score were calculated by the treating physicians. Results 424 subjects, 100% Caucasians, completed the survey. 233 (55,1%) were male, 220 (52.0%) had Crohn’s Disease (CD). Median baseline Mayo Score and Harvey Bradshaw Index were 3 and 4, respectively. 9 (2,1%) patients were referred to emergency department because of disease flares. 2 (1%) UC patients needed to add topical therapy, 9 (4%) CD patients started therapy with systemic steroids and 3 (1,3%) with biologics. 410 (96,9%) patients were satisfied about telemedicine, and 320 (76,5%) patients reported that would maintain this approach also after COVID-19 outbreak. On univariate logistic regression analysis, only a high ferritin value was found to be related to patients’ satisfaction (p=0.001). Lower calprotectin (p=0.012) and need for treatment change (p<0001) were found to be related to QoL, while CD (p=0.052), age (p=0.027), disease duration (p=0.046) and higher calprotectin (p=0.021) were associated to the need for treatment change. None of the variables were significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Our results confirm in an homogeneous cohort of IBD patients from southern Italy that a telemedicine approach can substitute face-to-face consultations at least for patients in remission or mild clinical activity. Patients’outcomes were not affected as far as concerns referral to emergency services or the use of steroids for disease flares. A high proportion of patients would maintain this management strategy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S4-S4
Author(s):  
Arslan Talat ◽  
Arielle Radin ◽  
Eve Frangopoulos ◽  
Michela Isono ◽  
Lea Ann Chen

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628482097121
Author(s):  
Philipp A. Reuken ◽  
Philip C. Grunert ◽  
Andreas Lügering ◽  
Niels Teich ◽  
Andreas Stallmach

Background: Physicians can improve their relationships with patients by understanding and meeting patients’ treatment targets, leading to higher adherence to therapy and improved disease prognosis. In the current study, we performed a questionnaire-based survey to further understand treatment targets in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: We created a questionnaire based on a point-allocation scale with 10 treatment target items. A total of 234 patients with IBD [Crohn’s disease ( n = 129) and ulcerative colitis ( n = 105)] participated in three German IBD centers. Patients were asked to allocate a total of 10 points across the 10 items, with more points indicating more importance. Results: The most important treatment targets for patients regarding their therapy were quality of life (2.78 points), control of defecation (1.53 points), and avoidance of IBD-related surgery (1.69 points). Avoiding surgery for IBD was less important in patients who had already undergone a surgical procedure than in those who had not (1.26 points versus 1.89 points, p < 0.001). Typical treatment targets, including mucosal healing (0.52 points) and normal biochemical markers (0.39 points), were not scored high by patients. The least important item was the possibility of all-oral therapy (0.19 points in 33 patients, 0 points in 201 patients). Conclusion: Treatment targets for patients were primarily related to quality of life, such as therapy side effects. Knowing these targets may improve patient–physician relationships and communication, and consequently, adherence to therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document