scholarly journals Features of energetic particle radial profiles inferred from geosynchronous responses to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 851-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Shi ◽  
E. Zesta ◽  
L. R. Lyons

Abstract. Determination of the radial profile of phase space density of relativistic electrons at constant adiabatic invariants is crucial for identifying the source for them within the outer radiation belt. The commonly used method is to convert flux observed at fixed energy to phase space density at constant first, second and third adiabatic invariants, which requires an empirical global magnetic field model and thus might produce some uncertainties in the final results. From a different perspective, in this paper we indirectly infer the shape of the radial profile of phase space density of relativistic electrons near the geosynchronous region by statistically examining the geosynchronous energetic flux response to 128 solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements during the years 2000 to 2003. We thus avoid the disadvantage of using empirical magnetic field models. Our results show that the flux response is species and energy dependent. For protons and low-energy electrons, the primary response to magnetospheric compression is an increase in flux at geosynchronous orbit. For relativistic electrons, the dominant response is a decrease in flux, which implies that the phase space density decreases toward increasing radial distance at geosynchronous orbit and leads to a local peak inside of geosynchronous orbit. The flux response of protons and non-relativistic electrons could result from a phase density that increases toward increasing radial distance, but this cannot be determined for sure due to the particle energization associated with pressure enhancements. Our results for relativistic electrons are consistent with previous results obtained using magnetic field models, thus providing additional confirmation that these results are correct and indicating that they are not the result of errors in their selected magnetic field model.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drew Turner ◽  
Ian Cohen ◽  
Kareem Sorathia ◽  
Sasha Ukhorskiy ◽  
Geoff Reeves ◽  
...  

<p>Earth’s magnetotail plasma sheet plays a crucial role in the variability of Earth’s outer electron radiation belt. Typically, injections of energetic electrons from Earth’s magnetotail into the outer radiation belt and inner magnetosphere during periods of substorm activity are not observed exceeding ~300 keV.  Consistent with that, phase space density radial distributions of electrons typically indicate that for electrons below ~300 keV, there is a source of electrons in the plasma sheet while for electrons with energies above that, there is a local source within the outer radiation belt itself.  However, here we ask the question: is this always the case or can the plasma sheet provide a direct source of relativistic (> ~500 keV) electrons into Earth’s outer radiation belt via substorm injection? Using phase space density analysis for fixed values of electron first and second adiabatic invariants, we use energetic electron data from NASA’s Van Allen Probes and Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) missions during periods in which MMS observed energetic electron injections in the plasma sheet while Van Allen Probes concurrently observed injections into the outer radiation belt. We report on cases that indicate there was a sufficient source of up to >1 MeV electrons in the electron injections in the plasma sheet as observed by MMS, yet Van Allen Probes did not see those energies injected inside of geosynchronous orbit.  From global insight with recent test-particle simulations in global, dynamic magnetospheric fields, we offer an explanation for why the highest-energy electrons might not be able to inject into the outer belt even while the lower energy (< ~300 keV) electrons do. Two other intriguing points that we will discuss concerning these results are: i) what acceleration mechanism is capable of producing such abundance of relativistic electrons at such large radial distances (X-GSE < -10 RE) in Earth’s magnetotail? and ii) during what conditions (if any) might injections of relativistic electrons be able to penetrate into the outer belt?</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (18) ◽  
pp. 4798-4802 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Morley ◽  
M. G. Henderson ◽  
G. D. Reeves ◽  
R. H. W. Friedel ◽  
D. N. Baker

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1351-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Baker ◽  
A. N. Jaynes ◽  
X. Li ◽  
M. G. Henderson ◽  
S. G. Kanekal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Yamamoto ◽  
Masahito Nosé ◽  
Kunihiro Keika ◽  
David Hartley ◽  
Charles Smith ◽  
...  

<p>Two wave packets of second harmonic poloidal Pc 4 waves with a wave frequency of ~7 mHz were detected by Van Allen Probe A at a radial distance of ~5.8 <em>R<sub>E</sub></em> and magnetic local time of 13 hr near the magnetic equator, where plasmaspheric refilling was in progress. Proton butterfly distributions with energy dispersions were also measured at the same time; the proton fluxes at 10–30 keV oscillated with the same frequency as the Pc 4 waves. Using the ion sounding technique, we find that the Pc 4 waves propagated eastward with an azimuthal wave number (<em>m</em> number) of ~220 and ~260 for each wave packet, respectively. Such eastward propagating high‐<em>m</em> (<em>m</em> > 100) waves were seldom reported in previous studies. The condition of drift‐bounce resonance is well satisfied for the estimated <em>m</em> numbers in both events. Proton phase space density was also examined to understand the wave excitation mechanism. We obtained temporal variations of the energy and radial gradient of the proton phase space density and find that temporal intensification of the radial gradient can generate the two wave packets. The cold electron density around the spacecraft apogee was >100 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the present events, and hence the eigenfrequency of the Pc 4 waves became lower. This causes the increase of the <em>m</em> number which satisfies the resonance condition of drift‐bounce resonance for 10–30 keV protons and meets the condition for destabilization due to gyrokinetic effect.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document