scholarly journals Microbial methanogenesis in the sulfate-reducing zone in sediments from Eckernförde Bay, SW Baltic Sea

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Maltby ◽  
Lea Steinle ◽  
Carolin R. Löscher ◽  
Hermann W. Bange ◽  
Martin A. Fischer ◽  
...  

Abstract. The presence of surface methanogenesis, located within the sulfate-reducing zone (0–30 centimeters below seafloor, cmbsf), was investigated in sediments of the seasonally hypoxic Eckernförde Bay, southwestern Baltic Sea. Water column parameters like oxygen, temperature and salinity together with porewater geochemistry and benthic methanogenesis rates were determined in the sampling area ''Boknis Eck'' quarterly from March 2013 to September 2014, to investigate the effect of seasonal environmental changes on the rate and distribution of surface methanogenesis and to estimate its potential contribution to benthic methane emissions. The metabolic pathway of methanogenesis in the presence or absence of sulfate reducers and after the addition of a non-competitive substrate was studied in four experimental setups: 1) unaltered sediment batch incubations (net methanogenesis), 2) 14C-bicarbonate labeling experiments (hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis), 3) manipulated experiments with addition of either molybdate (sulfate reducer inhibitor), 2-bromoethane-sulfonate (methanogen inhibitor), or methanol (non-competitive substrate, potential methanogenesis), 4) addition of 13C-labeled methanol (potential methylotrophic methanogenesis). After incubation with methanol in the manipulated experiments, molecular analyses were conducted to identify key functional methanogenic groups. Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in sediments below the sulfate-reducing zone (> 30 cmbsf) was determined by 14C-bicarbonate radiotracer incubation in samples collected in September 2013. Surface methanogenesis changed seasonally in the upper 30 cmbsf with rates increasing from March (0.2 nmol cm−3 d−1) to November (1.3 nmol cm−3 d−1) 2013 and March (0.2 nmol cm−3 d−1) to September (0.4 nmol cm−3 d−1) 2014, respectively. Its magnitude and distribution appeared to be controlled by organic matter availability, C / N, temperature, and oxygen in the water column, revealing higher rates in warm, stratified, hypoxic seasons (September/November) compared to colder, oxygenated seasons (March/June) of each year. The majority of surface methanogenesis was likely driven by the usage of non-competitive substrates (e.g., methanol and methylated compounds), to avoid competition with sulfate reducers, as it was indicated by the 1000–3000-fold increase in potential methanogenesis activity observed after methanol addition. Accordingly, competitive hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis increased in the sediment only below the depth of sulfate penetration (> 30 cmbsf). Members of the family Methanosarcinaceae, which are known for methylotrophic methanogenesis, were detected by PCR using Methanosarcinaceae-specific primers and are likely to be responsible for the observed surface methanogenesis. The present study indicated that surface methanogenesis makes an important contribute to the benthic methane budget of Eckernförde Bay sediments as it could directly feed into methane oxidation above the sulfate-methane transition zone.

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Maltby ◽  
Lea Steinle ◽  
Carolin R. Löscher ◽  
Hermann W. Bange ◽  
Martin A. Fischer ◽  
...  

Abstract. Benthic microbial methanogenesis is a known source of methane in marine systems. In most sediments, the majority of methanogenesis is located below the sulfate-reducing zone, as sulfate reducers outcompete methanogens for the major substrates hydrogen and acetate. The coexistence of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction has been shown before and is possible through the usage of noncompetitive substrates by methanogens such as methanol or methylated amines. However, knowledge about the magnitude, seasonality, and environmental controls of this noncompetitive methane production is sparse. In the present study, the presence of methanogenesis within the sulfate reduction zone (SRZ methanogenesis) was investigated in sediments (0–30 cm below seafloor, cm b.s.f.) of the seasonally hypoxic Eckernförde Bay in the southwestern Baltic Sea. Water column parameters such as oxygen, temperature, and salinity together with porewater geochemistry and benthic methanogenesis rates were determined in the sampling area Boknis Eck quarterly from March 2013 to September 2014 to investigate the effect of seasonal environmental changes on the rate and distribution of SRZ methanogenesis, to estimate its potential contribution to benthic methane emissions, and to identify the potential methanogenic groups responsible for SRZ methanogenesis. The metabolic pathway of methanogenesis in the presence or absence of sulfate reducers, which after the addition of a noncompetitive substrate was studied in four experimental setups: (1) unaltered sediment batch incubations (net methanogenesis), (2) 14C-bicarbonate labeling experiments (hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis), (3) manipulated experiments with the addition of either molybdate (sulfate reducer inhibitor), 2-bromoethanesulfonate (methanogen inhibitor), or methanol (noncompetitive substrate, potential methanogenesis), and (4) the addition of 13C-labeled methanol (potential methylotrophic methanogenesis). After incubation with methanol, molecular analyses were conducted to identify key functional methanogenic groups during methylotrophic methanogenesis. To also compare the magnitudes of SRZ methanogenesis with methanogenesis below the sulfate reduction zone (> 30 cm b.s.f.), hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis was determined by 14C-bicarbonate radiotracer incubation in samples collected in September 2013.SRZ methanogenesis changed seasonally in the upper 30 cm b.s.f. with rates increasing from March (0.2 nmol cm−3 d−1) to November (1.3 nmol cm−3 d−1) 2013 and March (0.2 nmol cm−3 d−1) to September (0.4 nmol cm−3 d−1) 2014. Its magnitude and distribution appeared to be controlled by organic matter availability, C / N, temperature, and oxygen in the water column, revealing higher rates in the warm, stratified, hypoxic seasons (September–November) compared to the colder, oxygenated seasons (March–June) of each year. The majority of SRZ methanogenesis was likely driven by the usage of noncompetitive substrates (e.g., methanol and methylated compounds) to avoid competition with sulfate reducers, as was indicated by the 1000–3000-fold increase in potential methanogenesis activity observed after methanol addition. Accordingly, competitive hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis increased in the sediment only below the depth of sulfate penetration (> 30 cm b.s.f.). Members of the family Methanosarcinaceae, which are known for methylotrophic methanogenesis, were detected by PCR using Methanosarcinaceae-specific primers and are likely to be responsible for the observed SRZ methanogenesis.The present study indicates that SRZ methanogenesis is an important component of the benthic methane budget and carbon cycling in Eckernförde Bay. Although its contributions to methane emissions from the sediment into the water column are probably minor, SRZ methanogenesis could directly feed into methane oxidation above the sulfate–methane transition zone.


2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 325-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Hietanen ◽  
Helena Jäntti ◽  
Christo Buizert ◽  
Klaus Jürgens ◽  
Matthias Labrenz ◽  
...  

Microbiology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Korneeva ◽  
N. V. Pimenov ◽  
A. V. Krek ◽  
T. P. Tourova ◽  
A. L. Bryukhanov

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 918-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Bagaev ◽  
Liliya Khatmullina ◽  
Irina Chubarenko

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3019-3024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lev N. Neretin ◽  
Raeid M. M. Abed ◽  
Axel Schippers ◽  
Carsten J. Schubert ◽  
Katharina Kohls ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 599-600 ◽  
pp. 560-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bagaev ◽  
A. Mizyuk ◽  
L. Khatmullina ◽  
I. Isachenko ◽  
I. Chubarenko

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 729-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Walter ◽  
U. Breitenbach ◽  
H. W. Bange ◽  
G. Nausch ◽  
D. W. R. Wallace

Abstract. In January 2003, a major inflow of cold and oxygen-rich North Sea Water in the Baltic Sea terminated an ongoing stagnation period in parts of the central Baltic Sea. In order to investigate the role of North Sea Water inflow to the Baltic Sea with regard to the production of nitrous oxide (N2O), we measured dissolved and atmospheric N2O at 26 stations in the southern and central Baltic Sea in October 2003. At the time of our cruise, water renewal had proceeded to the eastern Gotland Basin, whereas the western Gotland Basin was still unaffected by the inflow. The deep water renewal was detectable in the distributions of temperature, salinity, and oxygen concentrations as well as in the distribution of the N2O concentrations: Shallow stations in the Kiel Bight and Pomeranian Bight were well-ventilated with uniform N2O concentrations near equilibrium throughout the water column. In contrast, stations in the deep basins, such as the Bornholm and the Gotland Deep, showed a clear stratification with deep water affected by North Sea Water. Inflowing North Sea Water led to changed environmental conditions, especially enhanced oxygen (O2) or declining hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentrations, thus, affecting the conditions for the production of N2O. Pattern of N2O profiles and correlations with parameters like oxygen and nitrate differed between the basins. The dominant production pathway seems to be nitrification rather than denitrification. No indications for advection of N2O by North Sea Water were found. A rough budget revealed a significant surplus of in situ produced N2O after the inflow. However, due to the permanent halocline, it can be assumed that the formed N2O does not reach the atmosphere. Hydrographic aspects therefore are decisive factors determining the final release of produced N2O to the atmosphere.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Rush ◽  
L. Villanueva ◽  
M.T.J. van der Meer ◽  
E.C. Hopmans ◽  
J.S. Sinninghe Damsté
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 202 ◽  
pp. 280-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Jäntti ◽  
Bess B. Ward ◽  
Joachim W. Dippner ◽  
Susanna Hietanen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document