A review of specific storage values from pore pressure response to passive in situ stresses: Implications for sustainable groundwater management

Author(s):  
Wendy A Timms ◽  
M Faysal Chowdhury ◽  
Gabriel C Rau

<p>Specific storage (S<sub>s</sub>) values are important for analyzing the quantity of stored groundwater and for predicting drawdown to ensure sustainable pumping. This research compiled S<sub>s</sub> values from multiple available studies based on pore pressure responses to passive stresses, for comparison and discussion with relevant poroelastic theory and groundwater applications. We find that S<sub>s</sub> values from pore pressure responses to passive in situ stresses ranged from 1.3x10<sup>-7</sup> to 3.7x10<sup>-5</sup> m<sup>-1</sup> (geomean 2.0x10<sup>-6</sup> m-1, n=64 from 24 studies). This large S<sub>s</sub> dataset for confined aquifers included both consolidated and unconsolidated strata by extending two recent literature reviews. The dataset included several passive methods: Individual strains from Earth tides and atmospheric loading, their combined effect, and values derived from soil moisture loading due to rainfall events. The range of S<sub>s</sub> values spans approx. 2 orders of magnitude, far less than for hydraulic conductivity, a finding that has important implications for sustainable groundwater management. Both the range of values and maximum S<sub>s</sub> values in this large dataset were significantly smaller than S<sub>s</sub> values commonly applied including laboratory testing of cores, aquifer pump testing and numerical groundwater modelling. </p><p>Results confirm that S<sub>s</sub> is overestimated by assuming incompressible grains, particularly for consolidated rocks. It was also evident that Ss that commonly assumes uniaxial conditions underestimate S<sub>s</sub> that accounts for areal or volumetric conditions.  Further research is required to ensure that S<sub>s</sub> is not underestimated by assuming instantaneous pore pressure response to strains, particularly in low permeability strata. However, in low permeability strata S<sub>s</sub> could also be overestimated if based on total porosity (or moisture content) rather than a smaller free water content, due to water adsorbed by clay minerals. Further evaluation is also required for influences on S<sub>s</sub> from monitoring bore construction (ie. screen and casing or grouting), and S<sub>s</sub> derived from tidal stresses (undrained or constant mass conditions) that could underestimate S<sub>s</sub> applicable to groundwater pumping (drained or changing mass conditions). In summary, poroelastic effects that are often neglected in groundwater studies are clearly important for quantifying water flow and storage in strata with changing hydraulic stress and loading conditions. </p>

1989 ◽  
Vol 41 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.R. Warpinski ◽  
L.W. Teufel

Geophysics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 948-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas H. Green ◽  
Herbert F. Wang

The pore pressure response of saturated porous rock subjected to undrained compression at low effective stresses are investigated theoretically and experimentally. This behavior is quantified by the undrained pore pressure buildup coefficient, [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is fluid pressure, [Formula: see text] is confining pressure, and [Formula: see text] is the mass of fluid per unit bulk volume. The measured values for B for three sandstones and a dolomite arc near 1.0 at zero effective stress and decrease with increasing effective stress. In one sandstone, B is 0.62 at 13 MPa effective stress. These results agree with the theories of Gassmann (1951) and Bishop (1966), which assume a locally homogeneous solid framework. The decrease of B with increasing effective stress is probably related to crack closure and to high‐compressibility materials within the rock framework. The more general theories of Biot (1955) and Brown and Korringa (1975) introduce an additional parameter, the unjacketed pore compressibility, which can be determined from induced pore pressure results. Values of B close to 1 imply that under appropriate conditions within the crust, zones of low effective pressure characterized by low seismic wave velocity and high wave attenuation could exist. Also, in confined aquifer‐reservoir systems at very low effective stress states, the calculated specific storage coefficient is an order of magnitude larger than if less overpressured conditions prevailed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collins Ifeanyichukwu Anochikwa ◽  
Garth van der Kamp ◽  
S. Lee Barbour

Pore pressures within saturated subsurface formations respond to stress changes due to loading as well as to changes in pore pressure at the boundaries of the formation. The pore-pressure dynamics within a thick aquitard in response to water table fluctuations and mechanical loading due to soil moisture changes have been simulated using a coupled stress–strain and groundwater flow finite element formulation. This modelling approach isolates the component of pore-pressure response of soil moisture loading from that caused by water table fluctuations, by using a method of superposition. In this manner, the contributions to pore-pressure fluctuations that occur as a result of surface moisture loading (e.g., precipitation, evapotranspiration) can be isolated from the pore-pressure record. The required elastic stress–strain properties of the aquitard were obtained from the measured pore-pressure response to barometric pressure changes. Subsequently, the numerical simulations could be calibrated to the measured response by adjusting only the hydraulic conductivity. This paper highlights the significance of moisture loading effects in pore-pressure observations and describes an efficient technique for obtaining in situ stress–strain and hydraulic properties of near-surface aquitards.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document