Development of a dynamic European residential building stock typology for energy system analysis

Author(s):  
Max Kleinebrahm ◽  
Elias Naber ◽  
Jann Weinand ◽  
Russell McKenna ◽  
Armin Ardone

<p>In recent years, different approaches have been developed with the aim of defining representative buildings that can be used as a basis for residential building energy system analyses. Due to the coupling of different sectors at the household level, the analysis of future residential energy systems is becoming increasingly complex. On the European level a large amount of data has been published over the last years. This study combines multiple different data sets relevant for energy system analysis at the building level and presents a dynamic methodology for the derivation of representative building/household combinations, which can be used as a basis for residential energy system analyses on a European level. The approach enables representative buildings to be generated dynamically taking into account the parameters relevant to the respective research question. In a first step, various data sets are combined to describe local building properties, weather conditions, economic and ecological framework conditions as well as socio-demographic parameters on NUTS3 level. Based on the developed database, a two-step procedure for the derivation of building household combinations is presented. In the first step, a synthetic European population is generated by using iterative proportional fitting. In the second step different cluster approaches are compared for the derivation of case specific archetype buildings. Finally, the developed methodology is used in an exemplary way for the analysis of the potential of energy self-sufficient single-family buildings in the future European building stock by using a mixed integer linear programming optimization model for the optimal energy system design and dispatch of residential buildings, taking into account relevant framework conditions such as weather conditions, regulatory framework conditions and site-specific building properties.</p>

Energy Policy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 353-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Simoes ◽  
Wouter Nijs ◽  
Pablo Ruiz ◽  
Alessandra Sgobbi ◽  
Christian Thiel

2014 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 277-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Orehounig ◽  
Georgios Mavromatidis ◽  
Ralph Evins ◽  
Viktor Dorer ◽  
Jan Carmeliet

2020 ◽  
Vol 262 ◽  
pp. 110289
Author(s):  
Philipp A. Gunkel ◽  
Hardi Koduvere ◽  
Jon Gustav Kirkerud ◽  
Felipe Junqueira Fausto ◽  
Hans Ravn

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2129
Author(s):  
Oscar Svensson ◽  
Jamil Khan ◽  
Roger Hildingsson

The ambition to keep global warming well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, as recognised in the Paris Agreement, implies a reorientation towards low-carbon societal development and, ultimately, the decarbonisation of human societies and economies. While climate policy has been geared towards achieving set emission reduction targets, the decarbonisation of key socioeconomic sectors such as energy-intensive natural resource-based industries (ENRIs) has not yet been sufficiently addressed, neither politically nor in science. Decarbonising the ENRIs is a complex societal problem that will require structural transformation technologically as well as socially. Understanding the conditions for transformative change therefore necessitates integrated knowledge from multiple perspectives of different research fields. In this paper, we examine the potential of combining three different research fields and critically scrutinize the challenges to integration for understanding the conditions for industrial decarbonisation: energy system analysis, sustainability transition research and policy studies. We argue that these perspectives are complementary—a fundamental condition for fruitful integration—but not easily compatible since they are sometimes based on different ontological assumptions. The research fields are in themselves heterogeneous, which poses additional challenges to an integrated research approach. Drawing on experiences from a Swedish research project (GIST2050) on industrial decarbonisation, we suggest a modest approach to integrated research that could progressively develop from multidisciplinary exchange towards more integrated forms of interdisciplinarity by means of cross-disciplinary dialogue and understanding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document