scholarly journals Role of vegetation in representing land surface temperature in the CHTESSEL (CY45R1) and SURFEX-ISBA (v8.1) land surface models: a case study over Iberia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Nogueira ◽  
Clément Albergel ◽  
Souhail Boussetta ◽  
Frederico Johannsen ◽  
Isabel F Trigo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Land Surface Temperature ◽  
Vegetation Cover ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Vegetation Coverage ◽  
Daily Maximum ◽  
Cold Bias ◽  
Land Surface Models ◽  
Surface Models

Abstract. Earth observations were used to evaluate the representation of Land Surface Temperature (LST) and vegetation coverage over Iberia in two state-of-the-art land surface models (LSMs) – the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) Carbon-Hydrology Tiled ECMWF Scheme for Surface Exchanges over Land (CHTESSEL) and the Météo-France Interaction between Soil Biosphere and Atmosphere model (ISBA) within the SURface EXternalisée modelling platform (SURFEX-ISBA) for the 2004–2015 period. The results show that the daily maximum LST simulated by CHTESSEL over Iberia is affected by a large cold bias during summer months when compared against the Satellite Application Facility on Land Surface Analysis (LSA-SAF), reaching magnitudes larger than 10 °C over wide portions of central and southwestern Iberia. This error is shown to be tightly linked to a misrepresentation of the vegetation cover. In contrast, SURFEX simulations did not display such a cold bias. We show that this was due to the better representation of vegetation cover in SURFEX, which uses an updated land cover dataset (ECOCLIMAP-II) and an interactive vegetation evolution, representing seasonality. The representation of vegetation over Iberia in CHTESSEL was improved by combining information from the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI) land cover dataset with the Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) Leaf Area Index (LAI) and fraction of vegetation coverage (FCOVER). The proposed improvement in vegetation also includes a clumping approach that introduces seasonality to the vegetation cover. The results show significant added value, removing the daily maximum LST summer cold bias completely, without reducing the accuracy of the simulated LST, regardless of season or time of the day. The striking performance differences between SURFEX and CHTESSEL were fundamental to guide the developments in CHTESSEL highlighting the importance of using different models. This work has important implications: first, it takes advantage of LST, a key variable in surface-atmosphere energy and water exchanges, which is closely related to satellite top-of-atmosphere observations, to improve model’s representation of land surface processes. Second, CHTESSEL is the land surface model employed by ECMWF in the production of their weather forecasts and reanalysis, hence systematic errors in land surface variables and fluxes are then propagated into those products. Indeed, we show that the summer daily maximum LST cold bias over Iberia in CHTESSEL is present in the widely used ECMWF fifth generation reanalysis (ERA5). Finally, our results provide hints into the interaction between vegetation land-atmosphere exchanges, highlighting the relevance of the vegetation cover and respective seasonality in representing land surface temperature in both CHTESSEL and SURFEX. As a whole, this work demonstrates the added value in using multiple earth observation products for constraining and improving weather and climate simulations.

scholarly journals Role of vegetation in representing land surface temperature in the CHTESSEL (CY45R1) and SURFEX-ISBA (v8.1) land surface models: a case study over Iberia

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 3975-3993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Nogueira ◽  
Clément Albergel ◽  
Souhail Boussetta ◽  
Frederico Johannsen ◽  
Isabel F. Trigo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Land Surface Temperature ◽  
Vegetation Cover ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Vegetation Coverage ◽  
Daily Maximum ◽  
Cold Bias ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Surface Models

Abstract. Earth observations were used to evaluate the representation of land surface temperature (LST) and vegetation coverage over Iberia in two state-of-the-art land surface models (LSMs) – the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Carbon-Hydrology Tiled ECMWF Scheme for Surface Exchanges over Land (CHTESSEL) and the Météo-France Interaction between Soil Biosphere and Atmosphere model (ISBA) within the SURface EXternalisée modeling platform (SURFEX-ISBA) for the 2004–2015 period. The results showed that the daily maximum LST simulated by CHTESSEL over Iberia was affected by a large cold bias during summer months when compared against the Satellite Application Facility on Land Surface Analysis (LSA-SAF), reaching magnitudes larger than 10 ∘C over wide portions of central and southwestern Iberia. This error was shown to be tightly linked to a misrepresentation of the vegetation cover.  In contrast, SURFEX simulations did not display such a cold bias. We show that this was due to the better representation of vegetation cover in SURFEX, which uses an updated land cover dataset (ECOCLIMAP-II) and an interactive vegetation evolution, representing seasonality. The representation of vegetation over Iberia in CHTESSEL was improved by combining information from the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI) land cover dataset with the Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) leaf area index (LAI) and fraction of vegetation coverage (FCOVER). The proposed improvement in vegetation also included a clumping approach that introduces seasonality to the vegetation cover. The results showed significant added value, removing the daily maximum LST summer cold bias completely, without reducing the accuracy of the simulated LST, regardless of season or time of the day. The striking performance differences between SURFEX and CHTESSEL were fundamental to guiding the developments in CHTESSEL highlighting the importance of using different models. This work has important implications: first, it takes advantage of LST, a key variable in surface–atmosphere energy and water exchanges, which is closely related to satellite top-of-atmosphere observations, to improve the model's representation of land surface processes. Second, CHTESSEL is the land surface model employed by ECMWF in the production of their weather forecasts and reanalysis; hence systematic errors in land surface variables and fluxes are then propagated into those products. Indeed, we showed that the summer daily maximum LST cold bias over Iberia in CHTESSEL is present in the widely used ECMWF fifth-generation reanalysis (ERA5). Finally, our results provided hints about the interaction between vegetation land–atmosphere exchanges, highlighting the relevance of the vegetation cover and respective seasonality in representing land surface temperature in both CHTESSEL and SURFEX. As a whole, this work demonstrated the added value of using multiple earth observation products for constraining and improving weather and climate simulations.

On the added value of improving the spatial representation and seasonal variations of vegetation cover in land surface models for simulated land surface temperature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Nogueira ◽  
Clément Albergel ◽  
Souhail Boussetta ◽  
Frederico Johanssen ◽  
Emanuel Dutra
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Land Surface Temperature ◽  
Vegetation Cover ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Vegetation Coverage ◽  
Daily Maximum ◽  
Cold Bias ◽  
Earth Observations ◽  
Surface Models

<p>Earth observations were used to evaluate and improve the representation of Land Surface Temperature (LST) and vegetation coverage over Iberia in two state-of-the-art land surface models - the European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) Hydrology Tiled ECMWF Scheme for Surface Exchanges over Land (HTESSEL) and the Méteo-France Interaction between Soil Biosphere and Atmosphere model (ISBA) within the SURface EXternalisée modelling platform (SURFEX-ISBA) for the 2004-2015 period.</p><p>The results show that the daily maximum LST simulated by HTESSEL over Iberia is affected by a large cold bias during summer months when compared against the Satellite Application Facility Land Surface Analysis (LSA-SAF), reaching magnitude larger than 10ºC over wide portions of central and southwestern Iberia. This error is shown to be tightly linked to a misrepresentation of the vegetation cover.  In contrast, SURFEX simulations did not had such a cold bias. This was due to the better representation of vegetation coverage in SURFEX, which uses an updated land cover dataset (ECOCLIMAP II) and an interactive vegetation evolution, representing seasonality.</p><p>The representation of vegetation over Iberia in HTESSEL was improved by combining information from the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI) land cover dataset with the Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) Leaf Area Index (LAI) and fraction of vegetation coverage (FCOVER). The proposed improvement vegetation includes a clumping approach to introduce seasonality to the vegetation coverage. The results show significant added value, removing the daily maximum LST summer cold bias completely while never reducing the accuracy over all seasons and hours of the day.</p><p>This work has important implications: First, LST is a key variable in surface-atmosphere energy and water exchanges and, thus, its accurate representation in earth system models is very important. Second, HTESSEL is the land surface model employed by ECMWF in the production of their weather forecasts and reanalysis, hence systematic errors are propagated into these products. Indeed, we show that the summer daily maximum LST cold bias over Iberia in HTESSEL is present in the widely used ECMWF fifth generation reanalysis (ERA5) and fourth generation reanalysis (ERA-Interim).  Finally, our results provide hints into the interaction between vegetation land-atmosphere exchanges, highlight the consistent relevance of the vegetation cover and seasonality in representing land surface temperature in both models, and how earth observations play a critical role for constraining and improving weather and climate simulations.</p>

scholarly journals Cold Bias of ERA5 Summertime Daily Maximum Land Surface Temperature over Iberian Peninsula

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 2570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannsen ◽  
Ermida ◽  
Martins ◽  
Trigo ◽  
Nogueira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Iberian Peninsula ◽  
Land Surface Temperature ◽  
Vegetation Cover ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Daily Maximum ◽  
Cold Bias ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Density Parameter

Land surface temperature (LST) is a key variable in surface-atmosphere energy and water exchanges. The main goals of this study are to (i) evaluate the LST of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalyses over Iberian Peninsula using the Satellite Application Facility on Land Surface Analysis (LSA-SAF) product and to (ii) understand the main drivers of the LST errors in the reanalysis. Simulations with the ECMWF land-surface model in offline mode (uncoupled) were carried out over the Iberian Peninsula and compared with the reanalysis data. Several sensitivity simulations were performed in a confined domain centered in Southern Portugal to investigate potential sources of the LST errors. The Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) fraction of green vegetation cover (FCover) and the European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI) Land Cover dataset were explored. We found a general underestimation of daytime LST and slightly overestimation at night-time. The results indicate that there is still room for improvement in the simulation of LST in ECMWF products. Still, ERA5 presents an overall higher quality product in relation to ERA-Interim. Our analysis suggested a relation between the large daytime cold bias and vegetation cover differences between (ERA5 and CGLS FCocver) with a correlation of −0.45. The replacement of the low and high vegetation cover by those of ESA-CCI provided an overall reduction of the large Tmax biases during summer. The increased vertical resolution of the soil at the surface, has a positive impact, but much smaller when compared with the vegetation changes. The sensitivity of the vegetation density parameter, that currently depends on the vegetation type, provided further proof for a needed revision of the vegetation in the model, as there is a reasonable correlation between this parameter and the Tmax mean errors when using the ESA-CCI vegetation cover (while the same correlation cannot be reproduced with the original model vegetation). Our results support the hypothesis that vegetation cover is one of the main drivers of the LST summertime cold bias in ERA5 over Iberian Peninsula.

scholarly journals Cold Bias of ERA5 Summertime Daily Maximum Land Surface Temperature Over Iberian Peninsula

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederico Johannsen ◽  
Sofia Ermida ◽  
João Martins ◽  
Isabel F. Trigo ◽  
Miguel Nogueira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Iberian Peninsula ◽  
Land Surface Temperature ◽  
Vegetation Cover ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Daily Maximum ◽  
Cold Bias ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Density Parameter

Land surface temperature (LST) is a key variable in surface-atmosphere energy and water exchanges. The main goals of this study are to (i) evaluate the LST of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalyses over Iberian Peninsula using the Satellite Application Facility on Land Surface Analysis (LSA-SAF) product and to (ii) understand the main drivers of the LST errors in the reanalysis. Simulations with the ECMWF land-surface model in offline mode (uncoupled) were carried out over the Iberian Peninsula and compared with the reanalysis data. Several sensitivity simulations were performed in a confined domain centered in Southern Portugal to investigate potential sources of the LST errors. The Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) fraction of green vegetation cover (FCover) and the European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI) Land Cover dataset were explored. We found a general underestimation of daytime LST and slightly overestimation at night-time. The results indicate that there is still room for improvement in the simulation of LST in ECMWF products. Still, ERA5 presents an overall higher quality product in relation to ERA-Interim. Our analysis suggested a relation between the large daytime cold bias and vegetation cover differences between (ERA5 and CGLS FCocver) with a correlation of -0.45. The replacement of the low and high vegetation cover by those of ESA-CCI provided an overall reduction of the large Tmax biases during summer. The increased vertical resolution of the soil at the surface, has a positive impact, but much smaller when compared with the vegetation changes. The sensitivity of the vegetation density parameter, that currently depends on the vegetation type, provided further proof for a needed revision of the vegetation in the model, as there is a reasonable correlation between this parameter and the Tmax mean errors when using the ESA-CCI vegetation cover (while the same correlation cannot be reproduced with the original model vegetation). Our results support the hypothesis that vegetation cover is one of the main drivers of the LST summertime cold bias in ERA5 over Iberian Peninsula.

scholarly journals An evapotranspiration model self-calibrated from remotely sensed surface soil moisture, land surface temperature and vegetation cover fraction: application to disaggregated SMOS and MODIS data

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bouchra Ait Hssaine ◽  
Olivier Merlin ◽  
Jamal Ezzahar ◽  
Nitu Ojha ◽  
Salah Er-raki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Energy Balance ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Land Surface Temperature ◽  
Vegetation Cover ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Surface Soil Moisture ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Mean

Abstract. Thermal-based two-source energy balance modeling is very useful for estimating the land evapotranspiration (ET) at a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. However, the land surface temperature (LST) is not sufficient for constraining simultaneously both soil and vegetation flux components in such a way that assumptions (on either the soil or the vegetation fluxes) are commonly required. To avoid such assumptions, a new energy balance model (TSEB-SM) was recently developed in Ait Hssaine et al. (2018a) to integrate the microwave-derived near-surface soil moisture (SM), in addition to the thermal-derived LST and vegetation cover fraction (fc). Whereas, TSEB-SM has been recently tested using in-situ measurements, the objective of this paper is to evaluate the performance of TSEB-SM in real-life using 1 km resolution MODIS (Moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer) LST and fc data and the 1 km resolution SM data disaggregated from SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) observations by using DisPATCh. The approach is applied during a four-year period (2014–2018) over a rainfed wheat field in the Tensift basin, central Morocco, during a four-year period (2014–2018). The field was seeded for the 2014–2015 (S1), 2016–2017 (S2) and 2017–2018 (S3) agricultural season, while it was not ploughed (remained as bare soil) during the 2015–2016 (B1) agricultural season. The mean retrieved values of (arss, brss) calculated for the entire study period using satellite data are (7.32, 4.58). The daily calibrated αPT ranges between 0 and 1.38 for both S1 and S2. Its temporal variability is mainly attributed to the rainfall distribution along the agricultural season. For S3, the daily retrieved αPT remains at a mostly constant value (∼ 0.7) throughout the study period, because of the lack of clear sky disaggregated SM and LST observations during this season. Compared to eddy covariance measurements, TSEB driven only by LST and fc data significantly overestimates latent heat fluxes for the four seasons. The overall mean bias values are 119, 94, 128 and 181 W/m2 for S1, S2, S3 and B1 respectively. In contrast, these errors are much reduced when using TSEB-SM (SM and LST combined data) with the mean bias values estimated as 39, 4, 7 and 62 W/m2 for S1, S2, S3 and B1 respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document