scholarly journals Stratigraphic Identification with Airborne Electromagnetic Methods at the Hanford Site, Washington

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyooh Jaysaval ◽  
Judith L. Robinson ◽  
Timothy C. Johnson

Abstract. Stratigraphic units can influence the fate and transport of subsurface contaminants within groundwater. Units having coarse-grained sediments act as preferential flow pathways, and therefore can accelerate the transport of contaminants to reach human and ecological receptors. At legacy waste sites, detailed knowledge of subsurface stratigraphy can be used for effective monitoring and remediation planning to help minimize risk to human health and the environment. Airborne electromagnetic (AEM) methods can non-invasively provide information on kilometer-scale or larger subsurface stratigraphic features and fill informational gaps in directly sampled data from sparsely located boreholes. In this paper, we present inversion results of a 412 line-km frequency-domain AEM survey to delineate subsurface stratigraphic features at the Hanford Site, located in southeastern Washington State. The inversion was performed using a massively parallel 3D electromagnetic modeling and inversion code, where the modeling is based on solving frequency-domain Maxwell’s equations using an unstructured-mesh finite-element method and the inversion employs a Gauss-Newton optimization scheme. The results are compared to an underlying geologic framework model (GFM), built by interpolating contact depths of stratigraphic units interpreted from site borehole datasets. In areas with good borehole coverage, the inversion results show a good match with the GFM to a depth of about 60 m. Outside of these areas, the inversion results exhibit inconsistencies from the assumptions made to create the GFM, demonstrating that the AEM survey results can be used to improve the understanding of the geological conceptual model.

2020 ◽  
Vol 726 ◽  
pp. 138511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Di Prima ◽  
Thierry Winiarski ◽  
Rafael Angulo-Jaramillo ◽  
Ryan D. Stewart ◽  
Mirko Castellini ◽  
...  

Forests ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorit Julich ◽  
Stefan Julich ◽  
Karl-Heinz Feger

Soil Research ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 193 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Kanchanasut ◽  
DR Scotter

The distribution of surface-applied bromide, after leaching with 50 mm of ponded water, was measured in soil profiles under long-term pasture and under an oat crop. Also measured was the bromide distribution under pasture after leaching with natural rainfall. The method of water application, the vegetative cover, and the soil structure interacted to produce quite different leaching patterns. However, in all experiments the highest bromide concentrations after leaching were in the top 20 mm of soil. It is suggested that the vegetation, by inducing preferential flow pathways, retarded the leaching of bromide from the soil near the surface. Also rainfall on pasture apparently was subject to interception and stem-flow, which caused less effective leaching from the topsoil than would have occurred under fallow. Rainfall did, however, leach more efficiently than ponded water, probably as it induced largely unsaturated flow. But, even after 182 mm of rain in excess of evapotranspiration, 10% of the applied bromide was still recoverable from the top 50 mm of soil under pasture. Different soil structures under cropping and pasture affected the leaching patterns with ponded water. A compacted layer at 100-140 mm depth in the cropped soil apparently throttled infiltration, resulting in unsaturated flow, and hence more uniform miscible displacement below than above it. In all cases the bromide concentration at any soil depth was highly variable, with replicates tending toward a log-normal rather than normal frequency distribution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document