scholarly journals Feliks Nowowiejski’s Genealogy based on parish registers in the Archives of the Archdiocese of Warmia in Olsztyn

2021 ◽  
Vol 293 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-524
Author(s):  
Andrzej Kopiczko
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
pp. 45-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Razzell

A review of evidence on infant mortality derived from the London bills of mortality and parish registers indicates that there were major registration problems throughout the whole of the parish register period. One way of addressing these problems is to carry out reconstitution studies of individual London parishes, but there are a number of problems with reconstitution methodology, including the traffic in corpses between parishes both inside and outside of London and the negligence of clergymen in registering both baptisms and burials. In this paper the triangulation of sources has been employed to measure the adequacy of burial registration, including the comparison of data from bills of mortality, parish registers and probate returns, as well as the use of the same-name technique. This research indicates that between 20 and 40 per cent of burials went unregistered in London during the parish register period.


2019 ◽  
pp. 103-204
Author(s):  
Chris Galley

This paper, the second of four, examines patterns and trends in infant mortality during the period 1538–1837 when the principal source available to examine these issues is parish registers. It explains how to calculate infant mortality rates from parish registers, identifies trends and discusses possible explanations for the patterns of change identified. The paper also shows how new estimates of infant mortality can be readily undertaken and ends with suggestions for future research.


1902 ◽  
Vol s9-X (257) ◽  
pp. 428-428
Author(s):  
J. Cope
Keyword(s):  

1924 ◽  
Vol 146 (31) ◽  
pp. 82-83
Author(s):  
Herbert Southam
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Patrick Mulligan
Keyword(s):  

1978 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
R. A. P. Finlay
Keyword(s):  

1974 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 319
Author(s):  
Dorothy McLaren
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 23-39
Author(s):  
Ian Atherton

Twentieth-century practices of battlefield preservation construct war graves as sites of memory and continuing commemoration. Such ideas, though they have led archaeologists in a largely fruitless hunt for mass graves, should not be read back into the seventeenth century. Hitherto, little attention has been paid to the practices of battlefield burial, despite the suggestion that the civil wars were proportionately the bloodiest conflict in English history. This chapter analyses the evidence for the treatment of the dead of the civil wars, engaging with debates about the nature and preservation of civil-war battlefields, and the social memory of the civil wars in the mid and later seventeenth century. It concludes that ordinary civil-war soldiers were typically excluded from parish registers as a sign that they were branded as social outcasts in death.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document