scholarly journals Unsupervised Fine-tuning of Optical Flow for Better Motion Boundary Estimation

Author(s):  
Taha Alhersh ◽  
Heiner Stuckenschmidt
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 378-390
Author(s):  
Cheng Peng ◽  
Haozhi Huang ◽  
Ah-Chung Tsoi ◽  
Sio-Long Lo ◽  
Yun Liu ◽  
...  

ASHA Leader ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christi Miller
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkatesh Iyengar ◽  
Ibrahim Elmadfa

The food safety security (FSS) concept is perceived as an early warning system for minimizing food safety (FS) breaches, and it functions in conjunction with existing FS measures. Essentially, the function of FS and FSS measures can be visualized in two parts: (i) the FS preventive measures as actions taken at the stem level, and (ii) the FSS interventions as actions taken at the root level, to enhance the impact of the implemented safety steps. In practice, along with FS, FSS also draws its support from (i) legislative directives and regulatory measures for enforcing verifiable, timely, and effective compliance; (ii) measurement systems in place for sustained quality assurance; and (iii) shared responsibility to ensure cohesion among all the stakeholders namely, policy makers, regulators, food producers, processors and distributors, and consumers. However, the functional framework of FSS differs from that of FS by way of: (i) retooling the vulnerable segments of the preventive features of existing FS measures; (ii) fine-tuning response systems to efficiently preempt the FS breaches; (iii) building a long-term nutrient and toxicant surveillance network based on validated measurement systems functioning in real time; (iv) focusing on crisp, clear, and correct communication that resonates among all the stakeholders; and (v) developing inter-disciplinary human resources to meet ever-increasing FS challenges. Important determinants of FSS include: (i) strengthening international dialogue for refining regulatory reforms and addressing emerging risks; (ii) developing innovative and strategic action points for intervention {in addition to Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) procedures]; and (iii) introducing additional science-based tools such as metrology-based measurement systems.


2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S46-S50 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dawood ◽  
N. Lang ◽  
F. Büther ◽  
M. Schäfers ◽  
O. Schober ◽  
...  

Summary:Motion in PET/CT leads to artifacts in the reconstructed PET images due to the different acquisition times of positron emission tomography and computed tomography. The effect of motion on cardiac PET/CT images is evaluated in this study and a novel approach for motion correction based on optical flow methods is outlined. The Lukas-Kanade optical flow algorithm is used to calculate the motion vector field on both simulated phantom data as well as measured human PET data. The motion of the myocardium is corrected by non-linear registration techniques and results are compared to uncorrected images.


CICTP 2020 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Chen ◽  
Linkun Fan ◽  
Xuchuan Li ◽  
Congshuai Guo ◽  
Miaomiao Qiao
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document