Central Corneal Thickness in Microphthalmic Eyes with or without History of Congenital Cataract Surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ales Filous ◽  
Jakub Osmera ◽  
Martin Hlozanek ◽  
Gabriela Mahelkova
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 582-589
Author(s):  
Sepehr Feizi ◽  
Amir Faramarzi ◽  
Bahareh Kheiri

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer with that measured using the ocular response analyzer after congenital cataract surgery. Methods: This study included 113 eyes of 64 patients who underwent lensectomy and vitrectomy. In all, 36 eyes remained aphakic after surgery. Intraocular lens implantation was performed at the time of surgery in 47 eyes and secondarily in 30 eyes. Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure were measured. The influences of independent factors on the difference between the cornea-compensated intraocular pressure and intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer were investigated using linear regression analyses. Agreement between the two tonometers was investigated using the Bland and Altman and 95% limits of agreement analysis. Results: Central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, and corneal resistance factor were 591.2 ± 53.3 µm, 10.83 ± 2.27 mmHg, and 11.36 ± 2.14 mmHg, respectively. Cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (16.75 ± 4.82 mmHg) was significantly higher than intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer (14.41 ± 2.27 mmHg, p < 0.001). Central corneal thickness (p = 0.02) and corneal hysteresis (p < 0.001) were identified as the main predictors of difference between cornea-compensated intraocular pressure and intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer readings. A 95% limits of agreement for cornea-compensated intraocular pressure and intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer was between −4.86 and 9.53 mmHg in the entire group. Cornea-compensated intraocular pressure showed the best agreement with intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer in the primary pseudophakic subgroup as compared to the other subgroups. Conclusion: The Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular response analyzer cannot be used interchangeably for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery. The difference between the cornea-compensated intraocular pressure and intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer was primarily affected by central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Among the subgroups, the primary pseudophakic subgroup had the thinnest cornea and the highest corneal hysteresis values and demonstrated the best agreement between the two tonometers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (72) ◽  
pp. 5142-5145
Author(s):  
Subbiah Vasan Chandrakumar ◽  
Sooravali Ibrahim Thasneemsuraiya ◽  
Anujoseph Anujoseph ◽  
Devadoss Sangeetha ◽  
Ganesan Vidhubala ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 2041-2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Faramarzi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Javadi ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Jabbarpoor Bonyadi ◽  
Mehdi Yaseri

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia El Hamichi ◽  
Rafael J. Aguilar ◽  
Veronica Kon Graversen ◽  
Aaron S. Gold ◽  
Audina M. Berrocal ◽  
...  

We report a case of a 42-year-old male with a history of bilateral congenital cataract surgery performed at 2 years of age. The patient was left with aphakia, secondary glaucoma, and a history of diabetic macular edema in the setting of diabetes mellitus type 1. The right eye became prephthisical from his congenital surgical repair, and his left eye presented with an acute pseudo-endophthalmitis developing after the seventh intravitreal injection to treat the macular edema. The eye then presented with decrease in vision, periocular injection, and a diffuse inflammatory reaction focused around the anterior residual lens capsule. The patient underwent surgical removal of the residual capsule and primary vitrectomy repair of the eye, achieving a significant improvement in visual symptoms and recovery of visual and anatomic function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document