Impacted Autograft and Cementless Components in Acetabular Revision: A Retrospective Series

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-140
Author(s):  
Zhen Lai ◽  
Shi-Yuan Shi ◽  
Jun Fei ◽  
Wei Wei
Keyword(s):  
Acetabular Revision ◽  
Cementless Components

Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Dearborn ◽  
William H. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Revision ◽  
Cementless Components ◽  
Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty

Mid-term results of a cementless primary press-fit cup in acetabular revision surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Kolbe ◽  
B Zimmer ◽  
P Matheis ◽  
M Streit ◽  
T Gotterbarm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Acetabular Revision ◽  
Press Fit ◽  
Mid Term Results

CEMENTLESS COMPONENTS: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY

Orthopedics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 783-784
Author(s):  
William R Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Cementless Components

scholarly journals Reconstruction options for acetabular revision

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica D Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Acetabular Revision

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiological Results over the Medium Term of Isolated Acetabular Revision

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Piolanti ◽  
Lorenzo Andreani ◽  
Paolo Domenico Parchi ◽  
Enrico Bonicoli ◽  
Francesco Niccolai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Groin Pain ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Acetabular Revision ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Retrospective Design ◽  
Radiological Results ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results

Acetabular cup loosening is associated with pain, reduced function, and instability of the implant. If such event happens while the femoral implant is in a satisfactory position and is well fixed to the bone, isolated acetabular revision surgery is indicated. The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results over the medium term (12-month follow-up mean 36, max 60) of isolated acetabular revisions surgery using a porous hemispheric revision shell matched with a cemented all-poly cup and large diameter femoral head (>32). 33 patients were enrolled. We collect any relevant data from the clinical board. Routine clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively; the postoperative follow-up was made at 1, 3, and 6 months and yearly thereafter. At the last available follow-up, we report satisfactory improvement of functional scores in all the patients; 2 patients (6.1%) showed thigh pain and only 4 hips (12.11%) presented mild groin pain; all the femoral components are well fixed and there were no potential or pending rerevisions. With bias due to the follow-up and to the retrospective design of the study, we report clinical, functional, and radiological satisfactory results.

Predictive value of short-term migration in determining long-term stable fixation in cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (7_Supple_C) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. K. Laende ◽  
C. G. Richardson ◽  
M. J. Dunbar
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Porous Metal ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Total Point ◽  
Cementless Components

Aims Early implant migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) has been proposed as a useful predictor of long-term fixation of tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Evaluation of actual long-term fixation is of interest for cemented components, as well as for cementless fixation, which may offer long-term advantages once osseointegration has occurred. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term migration with one- and two-year migration to evaluate the predictive ability of short-term migration data and to compare migration and inducible displacement between cemented and cementless (porous metal monoblock) components at least ten years postoperatively. Patients and Methods Patients who had participated in RSA migration studies with two-year follow-up were recruited to return for a long-term follow-up, at least ten years from surgery. Two cemented tibial designs from two manufacturers and one porous metal monoblock cementless tibial design were studied. At the long-term follow-up, patients had supine RSA examinations to determine migration and loaded examinations (single leg stance) to determine inducible displacement. In total, 79 patients (54 female) returned, with mean time since surgery of 12 years (10 to 14). There were 58 cemented and 21 cementless tibial components. Results Migration at one year and two years was significantly correlated with long-term migration (p < 0.001). Median migration at the long-term follow-up was 0.6 mm (maximum total point motion; interquartile range (IQR) 0.4 to 0.9) for the cemented group and 0.6 mm (IQR 0.3 to 1.1) for the cementless group with no difference between groups (p = 0.99). Inducible displacement was significantly lower for the cementless components (p < 0.001). Conclusion Long-term migration was strongly correlated with two-year migration. Although long-term migration was not different for cemented or cementless tibial components, inducible displacement at the long-term visit was significantly lower for these cementless components, suggesting superior fixation. These findings support the predictive value of short-term migration in determining long-term fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):55–60

The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 959-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan W. Wachtl ◽  
Maximilien Jung ◽  
Roland P. Jakob ◽  
Emanuel Gautier
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Acetabular Revision

Bone Defect Determines Acetabular Revision Surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (10_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo García-Cimbrelo ◽  
Eduardo García-Rey
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defect ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Acetabular Revision

scholarly journals The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huifeng Ding ◽  
Yuanqing Mao ◽  
Bin Yu ◽  
Zhenan Zhu ◽  
Huiwu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Acetabular Revision
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document