scholarly journals Integrated Care Model Improves Skin Cancer Assessment and Treatments in South Eastern Sydney Local Health District

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Anna McGlynn ◽  
Julie Osborne ◽  
Anand Deva ◽  
Nick Vasudeva
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Brendon McDougall ◽  
Anna McGlynn ◽  
Julie Osborne ◽  
Heather Moses ◽  
Susan Sims ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Saxon ◽  
Daniel R. Kivlahan ◽  
Donelle Howell

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp18X697265
Author(s):  
Sonia Bussu

BackgroundDespite a growing body of literature on integrated, there remains a relatively small evidence base to suggest which elements of integrated care are most effective and how to implement them successfully. This might also be due to the fact that policy thinking around integrated care is struggling to translate into organisation change at the point of delivery. Better understanding of patterns of collaborations and integrated pathways is crucial to understand frontline staff’s OD needs and provide adequate support.AimThis paper focuses on the frontline level to assess progress towards integrated care in East London.MethodWe use admission avoidance (Rapid Response service) and discharge services (Discharge to Assess) as a lens to examine how frontline staff from secondary care, community health services and social service work together to deliver more integrated care. The study uses the Researcher in Residence (RiR), where the researcher is embedded in the in the organisations she is evaluating, as a key member of the delivery team.ResultsInitial findings suggest that while work on integrated care has enabled some level of collaborative working at strategic levels in partner organisations, on the frontline professionals are grappling with issues such as professional identity, professional boundaries, mutual trust and accountability, as new services and roles struggle to be fully embedded within the local health system.ConclusionThe paper sheds light on to the complexity on integrated care at the point of delivery. Better understanding of integrated care pathways is crucial to evidence patterns of collaboration across organisations; assess how these new roles and teams are embedding themselves within the local health economy; identify organisation development needs; and provide adequate support to frontline staff.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S297
Author(s):  
P. Pender ◽  
J. Leung ◽  
O. Gibbs ◽  
A. Hopkins ◽  
K. Kadapu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2110597
Author(s):  
Carlos Hernandez-Quiles ◽  
Máximo Bernabeu-Wittel ◽  
Bosco Barón-Franco ◽  
Alfonso Aguirre Palacios ◽  
M Rocio Garcia-Serrano ◽  
...  

Brief Summary The addition of home monitoring to an integrated care model in patients with advanced chronic heart/lung diseases decreases mortality, hospital and emergency admissions, improves functional status, HRQoL, and is cost-effective. Background Telemonitoring is a promising implement for medicine, but its efficacy is unknown in patients with advanced heart and lung failure (AHLF). Objective To determine the efficacy of a telemonitoring system added to coordinated clinical care in patients with AHLF. Design Randomized phase 3 multicenter clinical trial with parallel groups in adult patients. Participants Five spanish centers including patients with AHLF at discharge or in out-patient clinics. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive a remote bio-parameters telemonitoring system (TELECARE) or best usual care (UCARE). TELECARE patients were provided with devices that collected symptoms and bio-parameters, and transferred them synchronously to a call-center, with a real-time health-care response. Main Measures Primary end point was the need of admissions/emergency room visits at 45, 90, 180 days. Secondary end points included health care requirements, mortality, functional assessment, health related quality of life (HRQoL), perceived satisfaction, and cost-efficacy. Results 510 patients were included (54.5% women, median age 76.5 years; 63.1% suffered heart failure, 13.9% lung failure, and 22.9% both conditions). Clinical and functional features were comparable in both arms. TELECARE globally needed less admissions with respect UCARE after 45 days of inclusion (35.4% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.05). This tendency was maintained in the subgroups of patients with multimorbidity (34.2% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.05), intermediate risk of mortality (36.5% vs. 51.1%, p < 0.05), and those included after hospital discharge (34.9% vs. 50.5%, p < 0.01). HRQoL significantly improved (TELECARE/UCARE EuroQol baseline of 56.2 ± 18.2/55.1 ± 19.7, p = 0.054, and 64 ± 19.9/56.3 ± 21.6; p < 0.01 at the end), and perceived satisfaction was also higher (6.77 ± 0.52 vs. 6.62 ± 0.81, p < 0.001; highest possible score = 7). A trend to mortality decrease was also observed (12.9% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.13). TELECARE was cost-efficacious (TELECARE/UCARE QALY 3.94 Euros/0.81Euros). Conclusions The addition of a telemonitoring system to an integrated care model in patients with AHLF decreases hospital and emergency admissions, improves functional status as well as HRQoL, and is cost-efficacious.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document