scholarly journals Refractive Status in Children with Unilateral Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-191
Author(s):  
Nedime ŞAHİNOĞLU KEŞKEK ◽  
Handan CANAN ◽  
Aysel PELİT
Keyword(s):  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Refractive Status

scholarly journals Refraction in Children with Unilateral and Bilateral Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Krasina P. Valcheva ◽  
Snejana V. Murgova
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Refractive Status ◽  
General Populations

Summary The study aimed to identify the type of refraction in children with unilateral and bilateral congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) who underwent nasolacrimal duct probing. One hundred and twelve children aged 1.8 to 13 years, diagnosed with CNLDO, were included in a retrospective study. All the patients had their visual acuity examined, and their refractive status was evaluated. The refractive errors of both eyes were noted, followed by an appropriate management plan. Of the 112 children, 79 (70.5%) had a unilateral obstruction, and 33 (29.5%) had bilateral obstruction. Nine children (11.4%) in the former group and six children (18.2%) in the latter group were with visual acuity <0.8. The most frequent refractive error among the studied children was hyperopia. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between refraction of the two eyes in the evaluated children were found. Amblyopia risk factors were identified in 9 of the patients (8.0%). CNLDO did not adversely affect the refractive status. However, amblyogenic risk factors were found more often in our patients, as compared to general populations. Therefore, a detailed evaluation should be performed to find out these risk factors.

Spontaneous resolution rates in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction managed with massage or topical antibiotics compared with observation alone

2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2021-318853
Author(s):  
Brian G Mohney ◽  
Saraniya Sathiamoorthi ◽  
Ryan D Frank
Keyword(s):  
Medical Records ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Spontaneous Resolution ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Olmsted County ◽  
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Topical Antibiotics

Background/aimsTo determine if nasolacrimal massage or topical antibiotics are associated with higher rates of resolution compared with observation alone in a population-based cohort of infants with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).MethodsThe medical records of all children <5 years diagnosed with CNLDO while residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota from 1 January 1995 through 31 December 2004 were retrospectively reviewed for type of management and non-surgical resolution of tearing.ResultsAmong 1958 infants diagnosed and followed for CNLDO, 516 (26.4%) were merely observed, 506 (25.8%) were prescribed massage alone, 485 (24.8%) were prescribed at least one course of topical antibiotics, 397 (20.3%) were prescribed both topical antibiotics and massage, and 54 (2.8%) had no documented therapy. Non-surgical resolution, occurring in 1669 (85.2%) during a median follow-up of 3.1 months (range: 1 week–248 months), was 74.6% for the merely observed, 89.7% for those prescribed digital massage, 87.0% for those prescribed antibiotics and 90.7% for those treated with both. This comparison was significant in unadjusted (p<0.001) and multivariable comparisons (p<0.001).ConclusionPrescribing topical antibiotics or digital massage for infants with CNLDO in this cohort, individually or in combination, was associated with a higher rate of spontaneous resolution than observation alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document