Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: irrigation or probing?

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y S Kim ◽  
S C Moon ◽  
K W Yoo
Keyword(s):  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction

Spontaneous resolution rates in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction managed with massage or topical antibiotics compared with observation alone

2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2021-318853
Author(s):  
Brian G Mohney ◽  
Saraniya Sathiamoorthi ◽  
Ryan D Frank
Keyword(s):  
Medical Records ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Spontaneous Resolution ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Olmsted County ◽  
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Topical Antibiotics

Background/aimsTo determine if nasolacrimal massage or topical antibiotics are associated with higher rates of resolution compared with observation alone in a population-based cohort of infants with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).MethodsThe medical records of all children <5 years diagnosed with CNLDO while residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota from 1 January 1995 through 31 December 2004 were retrospectively reviewed for type of management and non-surgical resolution of tearing.ResultsAmong 1958 infants diagnosed and followed for CNLDO, 516 (26.4%) were merely observed, 506 (25.8%) were prescribed massage alone, 485 (24.8%) were prescribed at least one course of topical antibiotics, 397 (20.3%) were prescribed both topical antibiotics and massage, and 54 (2.8%) had no documented therapy. Non-surgical resolution, occurring in 1669 (85.2%) during a median follow-up of 3.1 months (range: 1 week–248 months), was 74.6% for the merely observed, 89.7% for those prescribed digital massage, 87.0% for those prescribed antibiotics and 90.7% for those treated with both. This comparison was significant in unadjusted (p<0.001) and multivariable comparisons (p<0.001).ConclusionPrescribing topical antibiotics or digital massage for infants with CNLDO in this cohort, individually or in combination, was associated with a higher rate of spontaneous resolution than observation alone.

scholarly journals Resolution of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with conservative management

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
J B Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Congenital Anomaly ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Topical Antibiotics ◽  
Appropriate Treatment

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is the commonly encountered congenital anomaly in pediatric population occurring in as many as 30% of new borns. Conservative management of such condition with topical antibiotics and properly performed massage of the nasolacrimal sac is appropriate treatment during the first few months of age. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of resolution of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with conservative management in infants up to 10 months of age. A total of 181 infants of age up to 10 months old with the diagnosis of Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction were advised nasolacrimal duct massage with or without the prescription of topical antibiotics. Resolution of nasolacrimal duct obstruction was assessed at 3 month and 6 month and was defined as the absence of all clinical signs of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. At the 6-month examination, 163 eyes (83%) of 181 children showed resolution with conservative management. The overall success rate of Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with conservative management was high and this form of management can be considered as one of the best options in infants.

Dacryostenosis in Newborns: Probing, or Syringing, or Both?

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Tahat
Keyword(s):  
Methylene Blue ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
The Third ◽  
Lacrimal System ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Nasolacrimal Ducts

Purpose This prospective study was designed to establish whether it is more effective to treat symptomatic congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction by probing, or high-pressure irrigation, or both. Methods During the period February 1991 to January 1999, 228 infants (300 nasolacrimal ducts) were examined (132 males, 96 females, age range 12–13 months). These patients were divided into three groups of 100 ducts each. The first group was probed only; in the second group the nasolacrimal ducts were irrigated under high pressure using methylene blue-stained saline, and the third group was probed and irrigated in the same setting. The procedures were done under light general anesthesia. Results Ninety-one ducts in the first group improved after probing. In the second group 64 ducts improved after irrigation. In the third group 96 ducts improved after both probing and irrigation. Conclusions To treat symptomatic congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, it is more effective to combine high-pressure irrigation and probing. This gives a better success rate, first in treatment and secondarily, permitting intraoperative verification of the patency of the excretory lacrimal system.

scholarly journals Rhinoscopy assisted lacrimal probing – minimal invasive and effective therapeutic option for children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-258
Author(s):  
Magdalena Prauzińska ◽  
Beata Pucher ◽  
Agata Kałużna-Młynarczyk ◽  
Michał Kotowski ◽  
Jagoda Kolasińska-Lipińska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Effective Therapeutic Option
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document