Keats's poems related to those of some of his friends : C.C. Clarke, Leigh Hunt, J.H. Reynolds, William Hazlitt, Charles Lamb, Charles Wells, Horace Smith and B.W. Procter

1959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzoh-wah Pun
On Essays ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 167-184
Author(s):  
Gregory Dart

This chapter explores the ambivalence of the Romantic familiar essay form towards the city by looking at the two main literary tributaries that fed into it—the current of self-consciously pro-metropolitan prose writing that had been inaugurated by Steele and Addison, and the more anti-commercial tradition of retirement poetry epitomized by William Cowper and the Lake poets. It looks at the way in which Leigh Hunt, William Hazlitt, and Charles Lamb in particular strove to bury their continuing misgivings about the polis as a centre of commercial rapacity and unruly popular politics in celebrations of the city as being, under certain controlled conditions, a precious haven of imaginative activity, personal reminiscence, and literary tradition. Their aim, even if it was never quite articulated as such, was to turn the Romantic periodical essay into a prose medium that was as sensitive as Wordsworth’s poetry to the ravages of recent historical change, while maintaining, in the end, a more progressive and forward-looking attitude to it.


2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
Heather B. Stone
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Burwick

Among all modes of literary expression, drama was the most popular, most lucrative, and most influential of the era. S. T. Coleridge, Joanna Baillie, Lord Byron, Mary Mitford were among the poets whose plays were successfully performed, and Coleridge joined Charles Lamb and William Hazlitt as critics of the drama. To shield church and state, censorship was exercised under the Licensing Act (1737). This Act granted to the licensed Theatres Royal the exclusive right to perform traditional comedy and tragedy. Originally directed to perform only musical entertainment and pantomime, the unlicensed theatres gradually introduced more spoken dialogue and relied on melodrama to attract audiences.


Author(s):  
Michael O'Neill

This chapter is concerned with the revolutionary imagination and Shelley’s relationship with Charles Lamb and William Hazlitt. It examines the personal and critical tensions between Shelley and his older contemporaries. Although Lamb and Hazlitt were outspoken in their objections to Shelley’s poetry and politics, the chapter traces their many affinities. It focuses mainly on Hazlitt’s response to Shelley and the conflicting feelings of contempt and admiration that Hazlitt has for Shelley and his poetry. The chapter identifies the ways in which the two writers converge and depart in their revolutionary, poetic, and philosophical ideals. Hazlitt, who places great value on disinterestedness, is identified as at first hopeful but ultimately aware of the difficulty of sustaining his revolutionary ideals. Thus, Hazlitt criticizes in Shelley an optimism that he believes to be naive. For Hazlitt, Shelley’s idealism isolates him and diminishes the potential achievement of his poetry. The chapter draws out the brilliance of Lamb’s and Hazlitt’s prose, and identifies ways in which the other Romantic poets’ antipathy toward Shelley is often accompanied with admiration. The chapter argues that Lamb’s and Hazlitt’s dislike of Shelley coexists with admiration, and that many of their condemnations of Shelley’s poetic, philosophical, and political ideals reveal an underlying acknowledgement of Shelley’s poetic genius.


Criticism ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-321
Author(s):  
Robert Keith Lapp
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uttara Natarajan

This essay treats Walter Pater's engagement with two key Romantic precursors, William Hazlitt and Charles Lamb. Hazlitt's influence is on Pater's characteristic genre, the verbal portrait that delineates a historical and cultural moment, as it manifests itself in an individual personality. Lamb's importance to Pater, on the other hand, is as paradigm or type: the man himself, as much as his writing. For Pater, Lamb's value is especially in his antiquarianism (an extraordinary, intimate relationship with the past), which is, at the same time and paradoxically, the indicator of modernity. The combination of past and present that Pater posits in Lamb captures the modern consciousness first described in The Renaissance (1873); equally, Lamb also embodies Pater's “reserve,” the ruling tenet of Appreciations (1889). Lamb's centrality to Pater's particular concerns and critical positions, illuminating in itself, also indicates a continuity from Pater's earliest to his later writings. Further, by uncovering the close and direct connections between Hazlitt, Lamb, and Pater, this essay establishes an identifiable line of succession in the practitioners of an important, but still largely neglected, prose genre of the nineteenth century.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document