Spin-In or Spin-Out?

2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Tidd ◽  
Simon Barnes

This paper examines the variety of corporate venturing activities in the pharmaceutical and life science sectors, identifies the range of initiators, motives and structures, and evaluates the potential opportunities for professional venture capital firms. On the one hand, pharmaceutical companies need to maintain the new product pipeline that has increased the demand for technology acquisition, and on the other, mergers and rationalization within the sector have resulted in a significant growth in technology divestment. Both trends have boosted corporate venturing activity. The study examines the venture activities of nine pharmaceutical firms, fourteen life science companies and seven corporate venture capital funds. The authors conclude that, while there is a wide range of venturing options, there is considerable confusion in the industry over ends and means. Specifically, many firms have failed to differentiate sufficiently between strategic, financial and operational goals, and have therefore created inappropriate forms of corporate venture.

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 258
Author(s):  
Tatiana Tauhata ◽  
Myles Flott ◽  
Michael Neubert ◽  
Samson Omale

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy G. Pollock ◽  
Bret R. Fund ◽  
Ted Baker

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1609-1630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varkey Titus ◽  
Jenny M. House ◽  
Jeffrey G. Covin

We utilize the exploration/exploitation framework to examine how a firm’s engagement in exploration influences its portfolio of external corporate venturing (ECV) activities. Three forms of equity-based ECV are considered: corporate venture capital investments, joint ventures, and acquisitions. The organizational learning literature is used to investigate how a firm’s engagement in exploration influences its usage of acquisitions relative to its overall portfolio of ECV activities. The investing firm’s industry technological dynamism is posited as a moderator of the relationship between exploration and the relative usage of acquisitions. Utilizing a sample of 1,326 firm-year observations between 1996 and 2008, we find that exploration is positively related to the relative usage of acquisitions, though this relationship is moderated by the investing firm’s industry technological dynamism.


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Unger ◽  
Virginia A. Greiman ◽  
Stephen A. Leybourne

Author(s):  
Shinhyung Kang ◽  
JungTae Hwang

The role of venture capital as mediator and gatekeeper is well acknowledged and geographical barriers for open innovation have been questioned, but venture capital firms’ distant investments have been investigated only rarely. The strategic benefits accrued from corporate venture capital (CVC) investment depend on the selection of target ventures. Prior research, however, overlooked the incurred information cost for identifying a potential target. Considering that innovative ventures often reside in distant locations, this paper aims to investigate what factors alleviate the information cost for CVCs when identifying target ventures in distant locations. We expect a CVC’s target selection in distant locations will be limited to the ventures under a tight appropriability regime, ventures within the same industries as a CVC’s business units, and ventures with pre-existing investors that a CVC has prior ties with. The hypotheses are tested with the data on CVC investments in the U.S. between 2006 and 2013. The results empirically support the hypotheses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document