Development and Validation of Pandemic-Related Psychological Distress Scale

Abstract Background Little is known about patients’ understanding of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This paper aims to develop and validate the Scoliosis Misconception Scale (SMS) and to explore patients’ level of misconception about AIS. Methods A total of 195 patients who were newly referred with newly diagnosed AIS were recruited to assess their levels of misconception and psychological distress before and after their first consultation with a specialist. The 17-item SMS was administered to assess patients’ level of misconception about AIS and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) was used to measure their level of distress. Results According to the Item Response Theory, all items were within the acceptable range from -3.69 to 2.39 for difficulty parameters, which determined the difficulty of the scale, while most of the items were within the acceptable range from 0.11 to 1.54 for the discrimination parameters, which determined the rate at which the probability of endorsing a correct item changes given ability levels. Internal consistency by marginal reliability was 0.66. One-sample t test revealed that participants on average scored 6.79 (SD = 2.12) before the first clinic session and 6.45 (SD = 2.51) after the first clinic session, both significantly higher than 0 [t(75) = 27.86, p < .001; t(75) = 22.43, p < .001]. Conclusions Despite a longstanding clinical model that functions well to treat AIS, most patients still have significant misconceptions about the condition. This highlights the necessity to assess patients’ knowledge level of a medical condition and potential generalisability of misconception–distress link to the forefront across other illnesses.

Download Full-text

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale

PsycTESTS Dataset ◽

10.1037/t08324-000 ◽

2002 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

R. C. Kessler ◽

G. Andrews ◽

L. J. Colpe ◽

E. Hiripi ◽

D. K. Mroczek ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psychological Distress ◽

Psychological Distress Scale ◽

Distress Scale ◽

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale

Download Full-text

Psychometric Validation of the Persian Version of the COVID-19-Related Psychological Distress Scale and Association with COVID-19 Fear, COVID-19 Anxiety, Optimism, and Lack of Resilience

International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction ◽

10.1007/s11469-021-00540-z ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Nabi Nazari ◽

Angelina Olegovna Zekiy ◽

Lin-Sen Feng ◽

Mark D. Griffiths

Keyword(s):

Psychological Distress ◽

Psychometric Validation ◽

Persian Version ◽

Psychological Distress Scale ◽

Distress Scale

Download Full-text

Adaptation and evaluation of COVID-19 related Psychological Distress Scale Turkish form

Death Studies ◽

10.1080/07481187.2021.1873459 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Tuğba Ay ◽

Deniz Oruç ◽

Asil Ali Özdoğru

Keyword(s):

Psychological Distress ◽

Psychological Distress Scale ◽

Distress Scale

Download Full-text

Suicidal Ideation and Predictors of Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Eswatini: A Population-Based Household Telephone Survey

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18136700 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (13) ◽

pp. 6700

Author(s):

Mduduzi Colani Shongwe ◽

Song-Lih Huang

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Psychological Distress ◽

Suicidal Ideation ◽

Telephone Survey ◽

Population Based ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Psychological Distress Scale ◽

The Government ◽

Distress Scale

The unpredictability of the COVID-19 pandemic can induce psychological distress in individuals. We investigated perceived stressors, prevalence of psychological distress and suicidal ideation, and predictors of psychological distress among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Eswatini. This study was a cross-sectional, population-based household telephone survey of 993 conveniently sampled adults (18+ years) from all the four administrative regions of Eswatini. Data were collected between 9 June and 18 July 2020 during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the country was under a partial lockdown. COVID-19-related psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler 6-item Psychological Distress Scale (K6). We performed weighted modified Poisson regression analyses to identify significant predictors of moderate/severe psychological distress (K6 scores: ≥5). The weighted prevalences of moderate (K6 scores: 5–12) and severe psychological distress (K6 scores: ≥13) were 41.7% and 5.4%, respectively. Participants reported several perceived COVID-19-related stressors, including worries and fears of the contagion-specific death, serious need for food and money, and concerns about loss of income or business. The weighted prevalence of suicidal ideation was 1.5%. Statistically significant predictors of increased risk for moderate/severe psychological distress included living in the Hhohho and Manzini regions; feeling not well informed about COVID-19; feeling lonely; having received COVID-19 food or financial relief from the government; feeling burdened by the lockdown; being married; and being youth (18–24 years). The results call for the government to urgently augment the provision of mental health services during the pandemic. Mental health practitioners and programs may use several stressors and risk factors identified in this study to inform interventions and government policies aimed at reducing psychological distress induced by the pandemic.

Download Full-text