The Effects of New Firm Survival and Growth when using Multiple Credit Sources

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (1) ◽  
pp. 10441
Author(s):  
John Martin Mueller ◽  
David Dubofsky
ILR Review ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1200-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarada ◽  
Oana Tocoian

This article studies how prior professional connections among founding employees predict a new firm’s short- and medium-term success. The authors apply three employment network measures to a large employer–employee matched Brazilian panel data set to find that network structures are strongly predictive of both firm survival and growth. All else equal, new firms with previously connected founding employees experience higher survival odds but slower early growth. Results suggest that working with former co-workers confers benefits such as resolved informational asymmetries, increased resource sharing, and nonpecuniary gains—qualities that are vital to new firm survival. High growth, however, likely benefits from a more varied resource set, facilitated by drawing on individuals from a multiplicity of employment backgrounds. In addition, the absence of prior ties may itself render the profit motive dominant, thereby increasing growth. Results are consistent across most sectors, initial firm sizes, and other sample selection criteria.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-273
Author(s):  
Silviano Esteve‐Pérez ◽  
Fadil Sahiti

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolin Haeussler ◽  
Maria Hennicke ◽  
Elisabeth Mueller

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 1350002 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUSAN COLEMAN ◽  
CARMEN COTEI ◽  
JOSEPH FARHAT

This article explores factors affecting the survival and exit routes of new firms created in 2004 using data from the Kauffman Firm Survey. We draw upon the Resource-Based View to test several hypotheses regarding the impact of both tangible and intangible resources on new firm survival in both service and non-service firms. We also distinguish between two types of exit: closures (permanently stopped operations) and mergers or acquisitions. Our results reveal that, although service and non-service firms may differ in terms of industry structure, the fundamental resources that contribute to their survival are the same: education, work and life experience and adequate levels of startup financial capital. In spite of these similarities, our results did reveal industry differences in terms of exit. We found serial entrepreneurs in the service sector were more likely to exit through merger or acquisition. Conversely, intellectual property decreased the likelihood of exit through merger or acquisition for non-service firms. Thus, our findings revealed a link between human capital, industry and exit route for this sample of new firms.


Author(s):  
Léo Paul Dana ◽  
Frank Lasch ◽  
Aliaa El Shoubaki ◽  
Frank Robert
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1401-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramón Rufín ◽  
Cayetano Medina

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Stearns ◽  
Nancy M. Carter ◽  
Paul D. Reynolds ◽  
Mary L. Williams
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document