The Inclusion of Corporate Venture Capitalists in Investment Syndicates

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (1) ◽  
pp. 16179
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Cabral ◽  
Shyam Kumar
1988 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Siegel ◽  
Eric Siegel ◽  
Ian C. MacMillan

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 13687
Author(s):  
Nathasit Gerdsri ◽  
Nisit Manotungvorapun

Innovation-driven enterprises (IDEs) steer their businesses with ideas, technology, and innovation. However, many of them have limited resources, capabilities, and readiness to turn their valuable creativity into marketable products. For IDE startups to survive and achieve sustainable growth, they must seek financial and other, non-pecuniary support from governmental agencies and large corporate venture capitalists. Usually, governments and large firms need to determine the readiness level (RL) of IDE startups, in order to set up proper strategies for resource allocation, resource prioritization, and collaborative R&D to support startups. In addition, IDE startups themselves also need to perform self-assessment of their readiness level to identify rooms for improvement. This research addresses the significance of IDE readiness assessment. An assessment framework, connecting four dimensions, specifically technology, manufacturing, business, and commerce, is proposed, and three case examples are presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed framework.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2431-2454
Author(s):  
Matteo Rossi ◽  
Giuseppe Festa ◽  
Armando Papa ◽  
Ashutosh Kolte ◽  
Rossana Piccolo

Purpose Institutional venture capitalists (IVCs) and corporate venture capitalists (CVCs) deploy analogous activities but adopt different approaches to financing innovation and value creation for venture-backed firms. Thus, this paper aims to investigate their potential ambidexterity as a result of knowledge management (KM) strategies and processes. Design/methodology/approach After a focused literature review showing evidence of KM behaviors as a source of potential ambidexterity for IVCs and CVCs, descriptive, inferential and discriminant analyses on the 15 most active IVCs and CVCs in the world in 2019 are presented. Correlations between numbers of deals, prevailing entrepreneurial intensity and potential ambidexterity are investigated. Findings Specific differences are analyzed from a KM perspective, revealing that the number/percentage of operations per round can result as a misleading criterion of knowledge accumulation. Finally, a theoretical model for ambidexterity for venture capitalists is developed. Originality/value The study shows that IVCs act with greater investment capacity because of their organizational structure and purpose and focus on financial goals; moreover, they are ambidextrous, although their exploration may more frequently entail exploitation than “real” exploration. CVCs tend to invest in sectors related to their core business, coherent with their strategic purpose and more oriented with KM strategies for accumulating intellectual capital.


Author(s):  
Matteo Rossi ◽  
Giuseppe Festa ◽  
Armando Papa ◽  
Paola Scorrano

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document