Inclusive Leadership, Policy-Practice Decoupling, and the Anomaly of Climate for Inclusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 11952
Author(s):  
Michàlle Mor Barak ◽  
Gil Luria ◽  
Kim Brimhall
2021 ◽  
pp. 105960112110059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michàlle E. Mor Barak ◽  
Gil Luria ◽  
Kim C. Brimhall

Inclusion is increasingly recognized as a critical leadership issue, yet research points to effectiveness variability among diversity and inclusion initiatives, indicative of potential policy-practice decoupling. Drawing on climate theory, we develop supervisors’ inclusive leadership and climate for inclusion and introducing CEO’s inclusive leadership and group diversity as moderators. To gain a deep understanding of decoupling, we use a multilevel approach and include in our model both top level leadership (CEOs), where espoused policies are determined, and group level leadership (supervisor), where enacted behaviors are experienced. We offer a novel perspective on climate theory for inclusion, which we have identified as “the anomaly of climate for inclusion.” Unlike other organizational climate facets, inclusion climate is shaped not only by the shared experiences of group members but also by their identities. Individuals from minority or underrepresented groups might experience decoupling in ways that are similar to other members from the same identity group even if they belong to different work groups. Our model, therefore, explains the process in which leaders create inclusive climate and point to boundary conditions in the process. We focus on two climate indicators: climate level and climate strength, and indicate that both are essential for understanding inclusion climate. Our conceptual model suggests that truly inclusive leaders would succeed at minimizing policy-practice coupling as perceived by all group members, not just historically dominant or high-status members. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.


Author(s):  
Dorothy N. Gamble ◽  
Tracy M. Soska

“Macro practice” is identified as social work with communities, organizations, and inter- and intra-organizational groups engaged in progressive maintenance or change strategies. Social workers in macro practice engage in planning, organizing, development, collaboration, leadership, policy practice, advocacy, and evaluation. In 2010, the Association of Community Organization and Social Administration (ACOSA) defined competencies expected of people doing this work. ACOSA identified two separate but related sets of competencies: one based on the literature found in its sponsored journal, The Journal of Community Practice, and a second derived from 10 competencies elaborated on in the Council on Social Work Education’s (CSWE) Educational Policies and Accreditation Standards. Identifying competencies defines knowledge, values, judgments, and skills that social workers doing macro practice should address. Evaluating competencies can be determined by educational programs, service organizations that employ macro practitioners, or by the practitioners themselves as they move through their career in social work.


Ob Gyn News ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 46-47
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Schneider
Keyword(s):  

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Schneider
Keyword(s):  

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 50-51
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Schneider
Keyword(s):  

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (21) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Schneider
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document