Hopewell Hierarchy or Heterarchy?

Author(s):  
Della Collins Cook ◽  
Ruth A. Brinker ◽  
Robin Moser Knabel ◽  
Ellen Salter-Pedersen

Chapter 11, part retrospective and part meta-analysis, takes a critical look at the bioarchaeological evidence of Hopewell social organization spanning much of Eastern North America from 200 B.C. to A.D. 500. Past archaeological work considered Hopewell as generally heterarchical and egalitarian. This synthesis of funerary pattern variation and a host of biological data discern patterns consistent with embodied social inequalities, with evidence of better health and diet associated with those of inferred high status. While acknowledging the substantial heterarchical dimensions of Hopewell social organization, Cook et al. suggest that the pendulum has swung too far from hierarchical models and any archaeological conception of the Hopewell tradition must engage the evidence of hierarchy visible in the remains of its people.

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick H. Brose ◽  
Daniel C. Dey ◽  
Ross J. Phillips ◽  
Thomas A. Waldrop

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Christenson

Although the interest in shell middens in North America is often traced to reports of the discoveries in Danish kjoekkenmoeddings in the mid-nineteenth century, extensive shell midden studies were already occurring on the East Coast by that time. This article reviews selected examples of this early work done by geologists and naturalists, which served as a foundation for shell midden studies by archaeologists after the Civil War.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Neely ◽  
◽  
Seth Stein ◽  
Miguel Merino ◽  
John Adams

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document